logging,create park,visit summer,visit winter,favourite trail,favourite activity,favourite place,favourite wildlife,most beautiful,ugliest,most fun,want to,activities,other activity,spend a million,pay fee,whats missing,not needed,fix it,important,earn income,value from,biodiversity habitat,watershed,heritage,manage access,recreation facilities,impact safety,first nation,aesthetics,vegetation,cattle,research,fish hunt,special events,boundary jurisdiction,culture history,new facilities,comment
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Powerface,hiking,Kananaskis,wolf,Sitting on a cliff watching clouds form,clear cut,Camping with my firends,"I would like to sit on a cliff, over-looking the forest and just watch.","hike, run, ski, camp, picnic, site-see",snow shoe,I would protect the area from development.,yes,,logging,,nature,no,,Stop logging and keep development to a minimum. Stop leasing the land to ranchers for grazing.,Stop logging and keep development to a minimum.,Leave it as it is.,,No.,"Yes, I am very concerned about the loss of wildlife habitat.",,Extremely.,It should not be clear cut. Re-planting does not solve the issues.,This is a problem. The cows displace wildlife and eat a lot of the available grasses.,Yes,Very good.,Large groups can go to Banff. There are lots of facilities there for them. There really is no place for large commercial operators in a Provincial Park.,The boundaries need to be expanded to ensure a wildlife corrider is maintained.,Absolutely.,Environmental awareness programs.,
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,Spray Lakes,"Hiking, sightseeing",Peter Lougheed Park,"Moose, deer, bear",How close the mountains are!,Any clearcutting.,"So many times, I couldn't count but especially the end of the summer interpretive program.",Keep on hiking and experiencing this wilderness area!,hike,sightseeing,"I would protect what I could of our beautiful, scenic area, even to the point of bribing officials!",yes,Nothing!,Logging and development.,Stop any more logging and development,all,no,recreation,Restrict and monitor how many people and how much development goes on in our beautiful resource.,We need to restrict and monitor water usage in all areas of the environment and educate people to what they can do to preserve it.,I love the way it is right now!,We can't have indescriminate logging and development. We have to think about our stewardship of the land.,We need to keep them updated and safe but I'm not sure that we need more than are already there.,Yes!,They are the stewards and should be asked for input.,Immeasurable!,I don't feel that it is with the clearcutting and logging that is being done.,Some is probably all right but it must be monitored. Don't consider myself an expert in this area but riparian health etc is quite often compromised by cattle.,All of these things in a healthy measure.,"Good, it is a very delicate balance.",Less.,"No, I love it as it is.",Absolutely!,I think we need to be more educated about this.,"When I moved to Calgary 16 yrs ago, I could not believe that this treasure was so close to the city. It makes me weep to think of it being compromised or changed in any way. I love it so much!"
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,Nihahi Ridge,hiking,Mesa Butte,all,The beautiful Wilderness,Clear cuts,Cross country skiing with groups of friends,continue to enjoy it in its pristine state,"hike,bicycle,ski",,Improve trails for hiking and set track cross country skiing. Subsidize operating expenses so as to avoide user fees (which would kill the spontaneous use by younger users).,no,Awareness that its real value for healthy recreation far outstrips its value from logging,logging - it totally destroys the trail experience for decades to come.,,recreation,no,,Dont mess with what we now have.,Status quo - preserve the forests so as to control erosion into the rivers.,Leave it in a natural state,"Logging makes a mockery of the recreational values of this incredible recreational resource situated right on the doorstep of a major and vibrant city with a young, educated and energetic population. Self propelled users only.","trails - some new, some improved.",Safety - no. Industrial activity - absolutely none unless limited tree cuts are necessary for wildlife management purposes and even then only on a highly controlled and very targeted basis.,limited to none,paramount - it is critical to thetrail experience.,No. The logging that has just happened and is proposed to continue is close to criminal.,Benefit,In all cases we are well informed. We do not need death and delays by committee and studies.,good,"Reasonable access by commercial operators such as horse outfitters/wranglers, trappers and hiking, cycling groups is fine.",This question is not clear to the lay reader,Of course - within realistic limits.,"Some huts for a hut-to-hut experience might be wonderful. Simple, inexpensive and possibly commercially operated, summer and winter (if we get any snow!).",K-Country is one of the great treasures of this province and we are in danger of damaging it for generations to come.
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,CoxHill,Hiking,no hwere particular,elk,scenery,development,censorei!,hike,"hike, bicycle, ski",fish,1. Complete TC Trail from Calgary to K country 2. Pave Spray Lakes road (I know yo don't want to hear that!),no,winter-accessible toilets,logging,the Calgary city watershed is beind degraded,recreation,no,,reduce development; keep out motorized vehicles,Forbid development (including residential properties!). Keep out stream degrading activities (eg ATVs),not necessary,"no logging, mining interests should be allowed. The concept of multi-use is not working",The environment is ALberta's best suit.Peopel who come here to enjoy our environment spend money. We need parks.,Water safety in Calgary is an issue,THe FIrst NAtions have never shown any regard for the environment; their impact must be minimized.,Very,It would appear not,Causes stream degradation. It is a problem,NO,Good,Less,Expand the parks!,Of course,"More parks, maintained trails, appropriate toilets",The degradationof the environment due to logging is a potentially serious problem for Calgary water supply and must be stopped. It is also ruing the toursit value.
yes,yes,frequent,frequent,Tom Snow,hiking,West Bragg Creek trailhead,"moose, deer",the forests,"clear-cuts, cowpies, oil exploration sites",hiking and a picnic with a moose looking on.,more of the same without industrial activity,"hike, bicycle, ski",walk the dogs,"use money for trail grooming in winter, maintenance in summer. Establish wildlife recreational park in the eastern Kananaskis similar to what is now in the western Kananaskis - Peter Lougheed Park.",yes,"government's recognition that this is a much-loved, much-used area throughout the year.","cowpies, industry",a new government that will hear the people,nature,no,"environment, recreation",By protecting key areas from the devastation caused by industrial use.,Stop clear-cutting in key watershed areas.,,"The multi-use policy is not working because it is destroying the environment. Access should be limited to only those who are there to enjoy, not harm, the surroundings.","No. We just need to preserve our important natural areas, recognizing the role they play in so many vital aspects of environment - like watershed, environment for wildlife, the opportunity for us all to enjoy the beautiful areas available.",No.,,"Hugely...for those who use it for recreation, for surrounding communities who depend on it as a visitor attraction, for real estate values in the area.","No. I would say clear-cutting isn't good forest manaqement, contrary to the Alberta government. Clear-cutting is forest destruction.",Problem.,No.,Very good.,Don't know.,"Yes, we need to create a park in the eastern Kananaskis area that will be free of all industrial activity and preserved for future generations.",Yes.,Don't know.,"It's such a beautiful, diverse area so close to Calgary and other areas in Alberta. We are very lucky to have it. What's wrong is that it is being destroyed by industrial use."
yes,yes,frequent,frequent,Telephone Loop,Trail Running,Powderface Ridge,Moose,,The Mclean Creek Logging,,,"run, bicycle, ski",,,yes,,,,,no,"environment, recreation, oil&gas",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,frequent,frequent,,hiking,west bragg creek,insects,"interdigitated forests, marsh and meadows",logging clearcuts,hiking at tree line,enjoy habitats without industrial impacts,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, skate, picnic, site-see, study",,Buy out the Forest Management Agreement & make a provincial park in NE Kananaskis,yes,Park,"Industrial uses (logging, oil & gas activity, cattle grazing)",natural processes; fixed by exclusion of industrial users & by encouragement of natural processes,nature,no,,"Exclude industrial users; allow natural disturbances to continue (i.e., fire, insects, forest diseases).","Exclude industrial users, provide latrines at trail heads and in heavily used recreation facilities.",Well-maintained hiking trails,The multi-use policy has failed. We need park protection.,No,"Yes. Industrial uses (logging, oil & gas, cattle grazing) are having an enormous negative impact on the Kananaskis environment",they should be consulted and accommodated in all land use planning.,extremely important,"Not at all. Clear-cut logging, cattle grazing, and oil & gas well sites/pipelines all degrade forest health. We need natural process to determine forest health (as they have for the past millenia).","It's a problem. Cattle grazing is a novel disturbance, with different impacts from native grazers. Instead, native herbivores (ungulates, ground squirrels, etc) are to be preferred.","More information is always useful. Impacts of industry, agriculture, and recreation on the natural environment are certainly worth determining.",good.,"Depends on the impact, really. Any low-impact disturbance, even if it's a large group, can be accommodated (depending on frequency).","Yes. We need more protected areas, and a termination of industrial uses.","Yes, if they exist.",Probably just latrines.,"Interesting: The varied landforms, habitats, and wildlife in NE K-Country. Wrong with it: The priority of industrial use over water supply (for Calgary), habitat (for local critters), and recreational opportunities (for all)"
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,Baldy Pass,Mountain Biking,Kananaskis,Bears,"Varied Terrain, alpine and forests",Clear cuts and logging roads,Camp every year for atleast 2 weeks,"Ride bikes, hike fish without development scars","hike, bicycle, ski, camp, swim, fish",,"Protect K-country from logging, restrict oil/gas development. Develop new trails to replace those lost to development, make everybody else see it for the world-class area that it is",yes,Mountain bike park,"Oil/gas wells, logging","Build new trails, stop industrial development",recreation,no,recreation,"Limit vehicle access, logging roads lead to easier 4x4 access which tears everything up",Preserve the upstream eco-system as much as possible,"New hiking/biking trails, linking together existing trails","4x4 access is out of control, see May long weekend in the Indian Graves area.",Some new campgrounds to eliminate the random campers,"Very concerned, I am surprised the development has gone this far, it's apalling",Stewards of the land,It's everything,No,"Can be a problem, but gates/fencing are a solution, it's better than logging",Ecology and tourism,Good,No,"Yes, include all the classic hiking/biking trails in a park, some of these are world class, losing them would be tragic",Yes,New campgrounds and trails,"Interesting: varied landscapes, alpine vs forest, montane, beautiful rivers Wrong: basically a double standard; big business get's whatever they want, tourism/recreation/ecology get nothing"
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,john snow,"biking, skiing",,moose,silence in the trees,old clearcuts,racing sticks in the streams with my kids,enjoy it the way it is,"hike, run, bicycle, ski",,"In my opinion, it doesn't need anything spending on it. Spending suggests development, and it's fine the way it is (assuming it stays the way it is).",yes,,,,nature,no,"environment, oil&gas",protect it.,create a park and prohibit industrial uses and development.,Nothing required.,"The policy is working currently, but if the slated deforestation is carried out, it won't be working.","No, fine as is.",No.,No idea.,Very.,Somewhat.,Not a problem for me.,No.,Fine.,Fine the way it is.,Create a park.,yes.,None.,
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Moose Mountain,Hiking and Biking,"Elbow Falls, Barrier Lake, Kananaskis River",Bears,The ecosystem,Resource extraction,Biking with friends.,Hike and bike in a natural ecosystem with minimal human disturbance.,"hike, bicycle, swim, site-see",,"I would increase infrastructure for the activities that I enjoy. I would increase the amount of interpretive trails, signage, park staff, similar to what is found in many of the national parks. I would maintain and improve existing trails.",yes,Information center,Resource extraction,Priorities. Community involvement and education about the area.,nature,no,"environment, tourism, recreation, film","We must be sure to manage these resources in a way that is sustainable for the long term, and not for quick economic gain. If resource extraction is unavoidable, it must be done with minimal impact.",Maintenance of riparian buffers that meet or exceed standards to prevent erosion and sedimentation.,"Increased signage in common areas and trails to make the public more aware of the natural resources and history in the area. Things such as interpretive trails, yearly festivals that promote sustainable use of the area, and interpretive guides or an information center.","The multi-use policy is not working as it appears to focused mainly on the resource extraction users. People should be given equal access, and activities that negatively affect other user groups should need to go through some public approval process before being allowed to occur.","An interpretation/information center would be very beneficial to help direct users to the many available resources in the area. In the more popular gathering places, increased facilities like public washrooms and group picnic areas could facilitate more events in the area.","I am concerned about how the current logging in the area is going to affect the habitat connectivity for a lot of the local wildlife, and the impact it is going to have on the water quality. As well, from the oil and gas extraction in the area, I am concerned about the potential for sour gas blowouts that may occur while I am hiking and biking in the valleys.","First Nations have a lot of valuable input towards the historical use of the land and the wildlife and plantlife that interact in the area. They have been able to live sustainably off the land for a long time, and they can provide valuable input for the way we use the area also.",I believe that the visual appeal is one of the main reasons that the majority of users come to Kananaskis. Drastic alteration of this area will result in users going elsewhere to places like Banff where resource extraction doesn't scar the landscape.,"The forest tends to do a very good job of managing itself. Surprisingly, it managed to do well for many centuries before we came onto the scene. I feel the current practices are short sighted and are not leading towards a long term sustainable ecosystem in the Kananaskis area.","Cattle grazing in the area on its own does not pose a great concern to me, but when you couple it with clear cut logging, then regrowth of native species may be restricted in the future. This interaction between the cows and the logging is definately something to be aware of.","We know very little about the ecology of the area, so it is hard to believe we could accurately manage resource extraction when we don't understand how the system works in an unperturbed state. I think the current levels of tourism can be sustainable if limited to specifically designated areas. The interaction of industry and agriculture on the landscape is definately something to investigate.","I think fishing and hunting restrictions are good for certain areas, as many places are very fragile. Increased access can have negative impacts on many native plant and animal species, so keeping to restricted areas can be a good thing until we know more about these fragile areas.",I think large events and commercial operators can be accomodated in specific areas if the facilities and resources are available to them. These events can be low impact if restricted to certain locations if the facilities are upgraded to accomodate them. I have trouble believing large groups could have the same impact as the current resource extraction is having in the area. There seems to be a disconnect here.,"I believe the foothills region is a very fragile and increasingly limited resource. If we could make the rest of the Kananaskis area into a park to help preserve many of the features that draw us all there, then many more Albertans will be able to enjoy it long into the future.",These resources should be preserved in the same sense as the natural resources should be preserved so future generations can share in these resources.,A new interpretive/information center as well as more public restroom facilities along the many stops from Bragg Creek to the Elbow Falls.,"K-Country is interesting because it represents a chance for a large population to connect with the wilderness. It gives young and old alike a chance to learn about and interact with the ecosystem, to catch a glimpse of the many unique species found here."
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,I'm sure i have been on every trail in kananaskis and it's difficult to pick one favourite!,mountain biking,West Bragg Creek start and throughout Kananaskis,bears,wildlife,logging and oil and gas road building devastation!!,Spending days hiking and camping with the wild horses nearby,Go there to re-build my spirit.,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, camp, site-see",Meditate in nature.,"Simply maintain the existing trails and infrastructure leaving as much as possible in a natural state to avoid disrupting the wildlife. Road building, logging and other disruptive operations do irreparable damage to wildlife.",yes,Balls! The government should listen to Albertans instead of companies for the Kananaskis area.,Logging operations; oil and gas companies.,Allowing road building for oil and gas companies & logging ruins Kananaskis for nature seekers.,nature,no,"environment, recreation",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,trails at end of West Bragg Creek Road,walking/hiking,Where Bragg Creek curves around anisland' of sand and rock,Moose,"the trees, the water, the air, the wildlife, the peace and quiet",clear cut trees,family exploring - everytime it is fun,"hike, camp, ski, bike",hike,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, horseback ride","Create a park, have trail maintance, hold nature walks/talks, create conservation & outdoor education groups/classes more trail signs and interpretive information.",yes,,oil and gas exploration and drilling. Logging. Industrial activity,,nature,no,environment,"Let them exisit without disturbance from machines, pollution. To not distroy their natural habitat. Educate the public.",Do not distroy or disturb the soil and watershed. Leave the areas natural. No logging. No oil and gas extraction or exploration.,"More educational nature events for a variety of ages at a low cost or no cost. Providing information in the form of brochures, articles.","I do not like the idea of ATV trails in K country, it is noisy and too disturbing.",,Yes. I am concerned about industrial waste and pollution. Iam concerned about reckless drivers on their way to Maclean CRK. I am concerned about abusing the land and landscape.,I do not know. I would hope it is one of preservation and not one of capitol gain at the cost of the environment.,Huge!!!! It is one of the most beautiful places in the world.,No. Government is interfering with Mother Nature.,I have never seen cattle. I have seen the evidence. There should not be too many.,"Yes, ecology, tourism, industry, ag.",good.,less,,yes,,The amount of wildlife it is home to. THe proximity to a city of one million people. The amount of trees and vegitation compared with the landscape just east of this region. It is unique and precious. It is wrong that it is a forest reserve.
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,Jumpingpound Ridge,Mountain biking,,bighorns,,ATV parks,paddling the Elbow River,continue what I'm doing,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, camp",kayak/canoe,"more trails, maintain existing ones",yes,,logging/ motorized sports,,recreation,no,"environment, tourism, recreation",controlled burns where required,preserve the watershed,trails,,"more trails, no more facilities",should be a park,,very important,,not a big deal to me at the current level,,good,less access,park,,no new programs,"the natural environment is good, commercial development not to my taste."
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,"Upper Lake Trail, Burstall Pass Trail","Hiking, swimming",Lower Kananaskis Lake,Grizzly bear,The unspoiled beauty and limited development.,The development such as clear cutting and power stations.,Hiking and swimming in lakes.,Continue to hike and play in relatively undeveloped land without touristy stuff.,"hike, bicycle, ski, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, horseback, fish",Just sit and enjoy the peace and sound of the birds and the trees.,"Create new parks to protect resources from being developed, buy up land to avoid private operators from creating tourist traps.",yes,More protected areas and parks.,"Clear cutting, any logging, any resource development.",Create parks to cover the remaining areas that can be easily exploited.,nature,no,environment,"Create parks, protect wildlife and plants through legislation, limit development.","Limit development in the area, avoid pollution by enforcing standards and refusing developers' pleas to exploit resources and build tourist meccas.","Continue to educate public about need to avoid litter, vehicle idling and stopping to take pictures of animals on roads.",,The land and sky are in fact the recreation facilities required. Please avoid building tourist attractions and large touristdraws'. This undermines the real reason for being in Kananaskis.,"I am concerned about the impact of industrial activities, tourist activities and resource exploitation such as logging.",Their role is important and special but they should be held to the same level of commitment to avoiding resource and tourist over-development.,Enormous. This is what visitors come for.,"The forest is being destroyed in various areas, contrary to public desire. No clear cutting should be allowed and logging should not proceed without fair and timely public consultation. The importance of the forest relates not only to people in the area but to all of Canada.",Both.,We need more information on the ecology. The public needs to be informed about every aspect that relates to the area.,Good.,"Less. Large groups and commercial operators have a huge impact on the environment. K Country should not be turned into another Banff where buses roll through, spewing out exhaust and littering and then moving on.",Parks should be implemented where there are none now particularly in areas where there is forest habitat.,Yes.,"More education on ecology, environment.","Too much logging, development. Some areas are horribly scarred from logging etc. Let Kananaskis heal and be a place for people to come and enjoy a reallywild' setting."
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,Jumping Pound-Cox Hill,Skiing,Sparrowhawk,Moose,Opportunity for straight through hiking in glorious terrain,industrial development,Gl;issading at Grizzly Col,"More of what I do already - ski, hike","hike, bicycle, ski, camp, picnic, site-see",bird i and flower identification,Put it into education to instruct us all on how to better protect and the need for such places.,yes,,High end accommodation; conflicting industrial uses,,nature,no,environment,Give their welfare first consideration when planning use,Protect the sources and courses in the best possible way. All else comes second,"When picnic, camping facilities are provided, keep them in the best possible condition and develop them in a way that is compatible with the sight. Deprivitize their management and enforce respectful use.",I don't know. Sour gas wells are definitely not compatible. Clear cutting is a primitive way to harvest timber. Why would you do that.,See above re picnic/camping. Opportunities for backcountry camping is a high priority for me. It is inappropriate I think to try to provide camping for the big recreational vehicles. It can't be done and retain the qualities that make the Kananaskis so fabulous.,"H2S wells scare me. Clear cutting, seismic lines etc depress me.",Don't know,Of the utmost.,"If the latest in the Sibbald is an example then no. In other areas, such as Rainy Pass the impact seems to have been considered.",I have not found it to be but do not know of their impace on the water courses.,More understanding and information to base decisions on is impossible to argue against. O f course,Good,Commercial operators should be minimized. Some special events such as group camping seem reasonable if people are respectful.,Don't know,Absolutely!!!!,,The diversity of the landscape and the fantastic trail system. Keep the roads small and simple . It suits the area and serves to keep speeding and accidents down.
yes,yes,frequent,frequent,too many to have only one!,mountain biking,k-country,I'm a fisheries biologist so I guess I have to say fish!,"the views, terrain, etc.",the recent logging pictures!,pretty much every time I get out there on a bike,"bike, hike","hike, run, bicycle, work",,"Protect the area, maintain trails, promote awareness",yes,trees,loggers,"get rid of the loggers, replant the area, keep industry out",nature,no,"environment, recreation",,"Testing, regulate headwater activities","more trail maintenance, more bike/hike friendly trails (less turning trails into flat walking paths)","Obviously not, logging activities exclude everyone else from favorite trails (i.e., Baldy Pass)",I've been happy with the facilities out there,Concerned about the impact of industry.,Would like to see them actively involved in the protection of the area,Very important,Not with the recent logging activity!,"From what I have seen, it's a less significant problem than the logging activity",Probably all,Good because it protects key species,?,What is the point of having parks but not protecting them? Something should be changed but not sure how.,Yes,Trail maintenance with input from all park users,"Good: All of the trails, views, etc. Bad: The recent increase in logging activity."
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,little elbow loop,tiding - biking - motorbiking - rafting,little elbow,,forest,logging in Mc clean creek,rafting,keep dooing what I do,"hike, bicycle, OHV, swim, picnic, site-see, horseback",,Improve service and control of not appropriate use of the area. Create more equipped areas and interpretative trails,yes,enforcement,industrial activities,"forest , reforestation NOW, reclaim truking roads",nature,no,environment,"controlled access, governmental and local interaction in the management of the resources form NON profit organization",Leave the forest where they are. No industrial activity that relay on water in K country.,Upgrade and maintain the networks of trails.,"Create different areas with different objective. Some area for ATV, some for hiking and riding, some restricted access to preserve nature. Stop the industrial activities. Fix what is destroy from logging with a REAL policy for reforestation and reclaim of the trucking roads",Fix the existing put more personal. Ranger station,"Very concern about industrial activities. HS2 wells easy to access, if someone want to play with gas pipe we could be in trouble .... What about a drunk ATV driver that smash into a valve ?","users, like everybody",Very important for tourism and recreation. If you want to keep calgarians spending their money for vacation in Alberta better there something nice to see...,"NO, the management plan of a forest can not be impartially handled by a logging company. Very bad practice from what I saw in the last 6 years","greasing could be beneficial, depend on how is managed. greasing could help to reduce fire hazard, overgrazing can take off food for wild species, destroy ecosystems, pollute watershed","We don't know to much, we can do more study , but for the moment will be better to suspend any industrial activities and control the uman access to the area.","Good, BUT restriction are useless if not enforced!!!","Everything mus be evaluated each time, some large groups event could be managed with less impact then few people doing legal activities (for example get a wood permit and cut down trees with the 5$ permit on the side of the road!!!)","create a park, involve local groups and community in the handling on their neighborhood. Don't let oil company and loggers to handle something that is of everyone to enjoy. Don't be ridiculous about the percentage of K country protected, is mostly above the tree lines !! Protect What is used and enjoyable, the forests",yes,"let people know what is there and tell them they need to respect and protect, go in the schools, bring the students out, they are the future generations, maybe the parents have different backgrounds and they do not respect nature, we need to teach kinds to change this attitude",
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,Fullerton Loop etc.,"hiking, snow-shoeing, cross-country skiing",from Bragg Creek to Canmore,"black bears, deer, mountain sheep, etc.","beautiful vistas & wildlife viewing, relaxation, excercise","development, logging",day-hike until we barely made it out when it got dark,"cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, hiking","hike, run, bicycle, ski, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, horseback, study",,"Protect the area and turn it into a fully-protected park: stop logging, stop development; outlaw ATVs etc.; Enhance trails, signs & outhouses; Add more wardens to check for poachers and damage by vehicles. Groom trails more often for X-country skiing.",yes,"Sufficient protection from loggers, ATVs & poachers","loggers, poachers, ATVs etc.","Awareness of ecotourism potential. Fix: education, media",nature,no,,"Create a park & let nature take it course (forest fires & pine beetles included!). Ban logging, ATVs etc. & poaching.","Ban oil & gas exploration/exploitation, logging, ATVs, etc. Only allow the existing agriculture to continue if they completely give up the use of chemicals. Stop diverting water for resource industries & agriculture. Make water meters mandatory within a year everywhere.","A once-a-day bus charter from Calgary in the morning & back in the evening during the summer season, for those without cars. Or, if this is not feasible, create a web site to coordinate carpooling.","BAN: resource exploration/exploitation, forestry, motorized vehicles, chemical-based agriculture and expansion of any agriculture. ALLOW: hiking, skiing, horse-riding, picnicking",Not critical. Maybe more outhouses far away from the parking lots where the trail heads are.,"Yes, about the impact of industrial/agricultural activities, so-called pine-beetleremediation', motorized vehicles","I am not aware of any First Nation input right now, but would encourage it and give it priority over that from others, as long as their priority is to protect the area. If they want to promotedevelopment', I would try to prevent that.",Extremely important. Who would want to go hiking or skiing in an area that is clear-cut?,"Clear-cutting is currently allowed with the excuse that it helps the pine beetle activity in the area. However, forest ecologists told me that the damage from the beetles is far outweighed by that from clear-cutting.","Tolerate the current leases, but don't add any new cattle, as this introduced species is bad for the native vegetation and for the floral and faunal biodiversity.","What we really need to know is who in this right-wing provincial government and the conservative caucus benefits financially from allowing oil & gas exploration, forestry, ranching, agriculture, bear hunting licenses etc. Once this becomes public knowledge, we might be able to sway public opinion towards protecting Kananaskis.","These activities are unnatural (whatever hunters and fishermen may claim to the contrary) and should not be allowed. Maybe, as a compromise, it might be allowed without too much damage in some fringe areas. might",Any motorized vehicles that are not on paved roads and parking lots cause significant damage and thus should be banned everywhere else.,"Protection is the magic word. If practical from a conservation point of view, re-establish wildlife corridors wherever possible.","Yes, all of those.","More education programs are needed (not only within the boundaries of Kananaskis, but also in the regular elementary and junior high school curricula) to counter the dominant redneck mentality about making a quick buck out of everything.","Interesting: views, flora, wildlife, trails for hiking, bicycling, horse riding, skiing. Wrong: industry, resource exploration/exploitation, motorized vehicles, bear hunting, etc."
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,upper Kananaskis Lake,camping,elbow loop,"deer, birds",the abundance of wildlife,bare patches of forest,Horseback Riding on my 10th wedding anniversary,bring my children and future grandchildren to Kananaskis to experience nature for years to come,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, horseback, study, work",,I would implement an official national park encompassing all of Kananaskis Country to ensure that future generations will enjoy this area.,yes,respect for our natural environment,loggers,our constant drive for financial gain has to stop overriding our responsibility to our planet,nature,no,environment,leave the area untouched and protected,leave the area untouched and protected,I would like to simply go more often,"Yes, however it would be important to have a governing body to ensure that all parties are acting responsibly",There should be an opportunity for improvements to existing recreation facilities under the guidance of a governing body,I am concerned about the effect that logging is having on Calgary's water supply and the effect that the logging is having on the wildlife in K-country,I don't know but I was saddened to see a gigantic gambling facility being built next to Highway #1.,Very important,Evidently not at the moment.,I don't see it as a problem if Ranchers are not logging large areas to increase grazing land area.,Absolutely,Very good,I believe that access should be limited with the aim of preserving the environment.,Evidently some review of current jurisdiction needs to happen in order that the environment can be preserved,Absolutely,I don't know,"Interesting? Everything about K-Country is interesting and worth preserving. What is wrong with it? Put simply, nothing....rather it is the individuals who are deciding its fate that are are in the wrong."
yes,yes,occasionally,infrequently,i have no favourite trail,walking and appreciating....,all of its unblemished beauty,all-including the vegetativewild' life,its solitude,reminders of human intrusion,being completely content...stress free....,to simply be there and enjoy it,"hike, bicycle, camp, swim, picnic, site-see","photography, paint, walk, appreciate....","find ways to deter the slaughter of the residents of these regions....ie, bring an end to hunting and fishing-aquatic hunting",yes,"respect for this land as what it is-nature, and nature's.",those who would destroy it and those who would kill...,the general attitude of the government...an election where people actually think.,nature,no,"environment, film","severely limit human incursion into such areas, with any human activity being no-impact, to low-impact. this means no hunting, fishing, logging, mining, recreational vehicles, etc....","protect both the water supply-quantity, and the water supply-quality. no syphoning off of the water and no toxins allowed in it.",leave it in its natural state. do not ever allow hunting or fishing.,"people who respect life, who do not see it as being theirs to take, exploit, destroy...","perhaps, but within human areas and not in the natural ones.",extremely.,"the role of the human is to be respectful of that which exists, including that which is not theirs.",very.,no.,it is a problem.,"we need to know about nature, and the need to preserve it, moreso thanconserve' it.",it should be banned completely in all regions natural.,"there should be no commercial operators, and access should be granted only to those who can ensure the maintaining of this regions natural integrity.","yes. we need to claw back all areas where the impact on the wildlife has been negative, promoting and protecting all wildlife corridors, etc.",yes,programs that disallow any invasive activities by the human animal.,"All that is natural is what is interesting about K-Country, but what is wrong is the fact that there is much that is unnatural here, including the killing of its residents."
yes,yes,frequent,frequent,All,"Cycling, Cross Country Sking, Running",All of K Country,Couger,Is to leave it alone,Logging,Just being there,The same as I do today,"hike, run, bicycle, ski",,Market the area for more peope to come and see this fantastic place.,no,Not alot,Monster Trucks,,all,no,environment,Greater budgets for those parties involved with the upkeep of the area.,Future investment,"Nothing, leave it as it is.",The multi-use policy is working but the off road vehicle sector should be manged more effectivly.,Washroom upgrades,No,Not Sure,Very,Yes,No.,Yes,No,No,No,Yes,,
yes,yes,occasionally,infrequently,Sulphur Springs,Biking,Moose Mountain,birds,Trees and wildlife,The well site,Biking,Bike,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, skate, camp",,"Just maintenance of the existing trails, otherwise leave it the way it is. It or was a beautiful place!",no,Trees,Logging,Horseback riders need respect for bikers as well.,nature,no,recreation,By not having to relocate either.,"They should have thought about that before logging, I have noticed a difference in Calgary water as I don't live there anymore but when I come to visit I notice.","Like I said keep it the way it is, maybe a little more signage for trails and spots of interest for tourists.","It is as long as some people don't think that they have more of a right to be there than others, like horseback riders.",No.,A little.,"To preserve the land, I would hope.","It's always been beautiful, so very.",Yes.,"Not at all, I enjoy seeing them when biking.",Sure.,"It keeps control, so good.",Restriction is good. Some people in large groups don't value the land or area.,Don't know.,Of course.,Would be nice to see more park people out there just for safety as there is a lot of wildlife.,
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,"Powder Face Ridge & Prairie View, if I am forced to choose","Mountainbike, hike, camp, sight seeing",Bragg Creek,Bears,Presence of wildlife in spite of such a high number of users. Shows respect of people for wildlife,"Cattle, their destruction of trails & clearcuts","Ripping downhills, overwhelming backcountry riding",All but destroy the environment,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, picnic, site-see, study",,If I could buy land out there I would,no,Less human impact,CATTLE!,"ASRD, should get in touch withe recreational needs of users",recreation,no,recreation,Minimize exploitation,Get rid of cattle,"That's up to me. I go out there to enjoy nature, not somebody's idea on entertainment",Should be a park,"NO, it should be left alone",My safety? NO Impact? Yes,NONE,Very,Was until it started to be logged,PROBLEM!!,,good,Deoends on the nature of the event. Isn't this pathetic? They can clear cut it but can't hold large events,,yes,,
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,Fullerton Loop,hiking/skiing/horseback riding,Big Elbow & Little Elbow trails into Tombstone area,all,being in Mother Nature's majesty,clear cut logging sites,lost in a snowstorm in July,visit & enjoy year round,site-see,I'm a marriage commission and do weddings there,"End logging NOW! Move MacLean area to ... ??? I hate the mess, noise & stink the motorized vehicles make. Continue with education re flora/fauna & ensure a full-time team + volunteers maintain trails & facilities",yes,,,,agriculture,yes,recreation,End logging and LISTEN to expertise re best management practises.,Stop any activities that endanger the watershed & establish/enforce riparian reserves,Access to information + lectures & tours,"Tourism, recreation, agriculture","The existing are excellent, just need to be maintained well.","Yes, I'm concerned about the impact of industrial activities","The share and enjoy as all other Canadians and visitors do. They could provide educational opportunities, too.",Critical...I see the clear-cutting from my home and it's a sacriledge.,No! Having a logging company as thesteward' is akin to the fox guarding the chick coop. This has to stop,I believe we can coexist with the cattle.,"Decision makers just need to LISTEN to experts in biology, zoology, etc.",It a GOOD thing.,"No, I don't want a Canmore or Banff fiasco happening there.",Create the park that's being reque3sted,Ask experts in this field and they'll tell you. Then LISTEN!,I'm happy with existing,Everything is interesting. Wrong: I believe Maclean Creek is a mess and the motorized vehicle area should be shut down.
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,,hike,the streams,all of them,it's wildness,,in the winter with the children sleding,know that it is there as nature intended it to be,ski,hike ski camp study site see,buy it and save it as is People could use it as it is now set up but they would pay just enough to assure of its care,yes,,,,nature,no,environment,keep as is,moniter closely,maps,no keep the treasure free from ruin,no,concerned about the world,"we are all one people, they too must see the need for it freedom from ruin",,"some are too greedy, this needs to be stopped","this must be monitored carefully, nature must come first",,good,less access for large and commercial,NO,yes,,Keep this valuable resorce as a jewel for Canada. Don't let america get ahead of you on this
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,Ribbon Creek,"Hiking, backpacking, xcountry skiing",Little Elbow campground,All!,Mountains with trees,clear-cuts,Camping alone there with my friends when I was 16,"Hike, xcountry ski","hike, ski, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, study, work",,"Create a park, and use the money for protection and maintenance of the park",yes,,Logging,,nature,no,"environment, tourism, recreation, film","Educate people about conservation, limit industrial development including logging",Protect the trees that form part of the watershed by creating a park.,I enjoy the informational walking trails,The multi-use policy is not working. When the area is used for industrial development all other uses are no longer possible,No.,Yes.,Unsure.,Very,"No. The SRD Department needs to come up with a better land-use framework, or create a park",Unsure.,The role the area plays in Calgary's water supply.,Good.,Unsure.,Create a Provincial Park over the entire area,Yes.,Unsure.,"I think that all of the trails are very interesting, and the wildlife that live there. I'm glad that it's so close to the City of Calgary, and I think it's impoartant for many residents."
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,Prairie View/Jewel Pass/Baldy Pass/ JP Ridge/Cox Hill,Mtn Biking,Galatea/Cox Hill,"The Grizz, Mountain Goats, Black Bears",Lillian Lake off Galatea,"Besides me, I'd have to say some of the Mclean Creek area",The Bow 80 race in 2006,Ride my bike with my kids when they grow up,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, picnic, site-see, work",Flying over it in Josh Robinsons plane,"I would preserve the proposed park area, allow a bit of selected logging(not clearcutting) but leave every other tree type, to calm the fire hazard. I would leave the trails where they are and have an education program to teach others how to preserve it.",yes,The public input to stop the clearcutting.,"Golf Courses, ski hills, residential & retail developments","clearcuts, selective logging like the fire breaks in Banff & Canmore could be acceptable.",all,no,"environment, tourism, recreation, guiding","Allow nature to thrive the way it has for millenia before we all decided we need toManage' it. That means let fires happen, and if not burns, then selective logging to prevent intense fires. Would it cost too much though.","The watershed needs to be protected from clearcutting, and siltation. The Oil & Gas industry seems to be detrimental too. The stuff I see in the creeks now that used to run clean makes me sick. The water looks like it is toxic!",You could allow the Trans-Rockies race organizers let in more riders so they can break even for the costs involved. We lost that race to BC cause the Gov't isprotecting' the environment.,Recreational activities that aren't detrimental to the place. Selective logging to keep the fire hazard down. The multi-use policy does have benefits but the Corporations get too much leeway to profit off of it.,"No. No more golf courses, ski hills, or helicopter traffic. They seem too invasive.","Somewhat. I don't like logged out areas, cause the confusion all the roads cause getting us lost out in the middle of nowhere even when we have a map.","They were protecting it, but now they are turning toowhite' sometimes. Example: The Casino! What a beautiful way to sayWelcome To The Rockie Mountains!'","Very Important! Every European I've met says how much they like it because it is pristine. They all say Protect it, cause once it's gone, it's gone forever.","Not Really. IF they logged it like the firebreaks in Canmore were done, it wouldn't be a problem for me. The areas still are forested, but a lot of trees were taken, and the underbrush was cleared, but the area is still beautiful to look at. Five yrs later, it would look like it was left alone.",Just when they use the creeks and trails for their toilets! The cows also completely destroy the trails. So I think it's a small problem,"Yes, all of the above.",Good,In a way yes. Millions of tourist dollars were lost when the Trans-Rockies race went only to BC. All because th Gov't wouldn't allow them to let in 100 more riders.,Maybe. Make it a provincial park!,Very much so!,"Education Programs. Some bike riders think killing trees and making jumpe is OK, when it is not! I disagree with them building trails wherever they think they can!","The beauty, the ruggedness, and the feeling ofgetting away from it all' I don't feel that on a paved trail, or paved campsite/picnic area(Elbow Falls/Allen Bill Pond) They are also turning all the trails into roads! Powderface trail was destroyed this year, and so was the Elbow Falls area with paving everywhere.Pavement does not make it an attractive place."
yes,yes,occasionally,infrequently,,Mountain Biking,,,"The trees, the views, the rivers",logging,biking down a windy trail,continue biking and hiking,"hike, bicycle, ski, climb, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see",,Protect its beautiful places.,yes,it might be nice to have a nice lodge for people to stop at,logging,,recreation,no,"environment, recreation",Protect the landscape.,Protect the landscape.,Protect the landscape. Maintain high quality trails.,"Yes, the multi-use policy is working because certain uses are separated and have their own places.","I don't think it's necessary, but it might be nice to have a place for people to relax, have a snack indoors and create central gathering places.","Yes, I'm concerned about logging.",,Very important.,"I haven't been everywhere, but in some places (West of Bragg Creek) logging has definitely had an impact. Other areas I've been have been ok.","I personally don't mind, but I'm curious about what it does for the environment.",,"Definitely good. Hunting would certainly not mix with some other uses. If the impact on the health of the environment is too great, then yes, they should be restricted.","It's nice that the area isn't overburdened with large numbers of people. I'm uncertain whether this could be increased or not, so some continuing control is probably necessary.",,yes,,The opportunity for enjoyable recreational activities in a beautiful setting. There is no other place like it near Calgary. The logging is what's wrong with K-Country.
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Three Isle,Hiking and Backcountry Camping,In both parks and Wildland areas,Moose,The stillness created by nature,Human interference,"A 100km plus hike through, near and by Evan Thomas with over 120 water crossings when I was 13 years",I'm doing what I enjoy.,"hike, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, fish, study, work",,I would continue to expand the Park areas. As they are the highest level of protection we can ensure for wild spaces. I would expand the interpretive program in Kananaskis and clean up Mclean Creek. It's like Mad Max in there.,no,"Municipal, Provincial and Federal involvement.",Industry,"Our mentality on wildspaces. Awareness, Stewardship and Action.",all,yes,"environment, tourism, recreation, retail",Understand that KC's biodiversity depends on the all of the natural flora and fauna working together. When one or many parts are removed the systems suffers as a whole.,Stop polluting it. Seems pretty clear to me (no pun intended).,Group camp fees are making it difficult for social youth groups to come out to KC. These fees are regulated through the Provincial Government and the private contractors. A discount for non-profit groups like Scouts needs to be arranged.,I don't have enough information on this question to answer confidently.,"Individual winter camping would be great; however, I understand that such a service is based on usage.",Yes.,I don't know but the Casino at the north entrance to KC is a disgrace and eyesore.,To a local who's been visiting KC for the last 19 years the visual appeal of KC is one of nostalgia or solace for me.,Not from my perspective.,I've heard that KC ranchers have problems with local wildlife such as cougars interacting with their livestock. I can understand their compliants but having KC as a protected wildspace is more important in my opinion then the cattle ranchers lose. Predators at the top of the food chain represent the health of the ecosystem. Like the rest of the ecosystem's parts predators just like trees or soil help to regulate the system as a whole.,The more information we have the better decision we can make.,"Good, good, good! In some areas you can hunt from roads, that's ridiculous. The collared Grizzly bears in KC paid no heed to political boundaries. And some are lost when they leave KC's, specifically Peter Lougheed's protection and head into B.C.'s unregulated and unprotected spaces.",All depending on what events.,More protected spaces.,Yes.,More awareness and more protection. From what I can gather the PLPP and BVPP bear aversion programs are some of the best in the world. They are an essential part of living in bear country safely and without more negative consequence to local wildlife. With more parks come more programs that are aimed to help and protect the environment.,"It's a huge area with differing levels of protection. In some areas, Mclean Creek, it seems that users can do whatever they want, in others like the three provincial parks a more reasonable approach to how humans interact with the land is taken. More protection for KC is needed as the impetus to take resources from KC will not decrease but increase."
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,"Prairie Creek, Moose Mountain, Powderface",climbing,White Buddha,deer,ridglines,clearcuts,rock climbing,rock climb,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, picnic",,maintain trails,yes,winter maintenance of roads,"private roads, barriers, closures",too many private and business monopolies,recreation,no,"environment, tourism, recreation",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,frequent,infrequently,TW on Moose Mountain,DH mountain biking,Moose Mountain,cougar,Moose Mountain in the fall,Maclean Creek ORV area,,Develop more dh trails,bicycle,,I'd use it to develop a world class mountain bike trail system that caters to all levels of riders and to all disciplines. With a fund set up to provide monies for ongoing trail maintenance and advocacy.,yes,A cohesive plan to maintain and develop riding trails,,"Trail maintenance is relatively non-existant, developing a volunteer organization as stewards",all,no,recreation,,Focus all trail building on reducing any downstream siltation,,,We need better trail maintenance.,,,,,The only problem is the poo bombs they leave on the trails.,,,I have run MtB races in the area and the regulations are adequate to keep any fly by night operators out and to make sure that the area remains in good condition.,Some area could be consolidated. We had to apply to two different juristictions for approval to host a MTB race on Moose Mountain simply because Moose Packers and Tom Snow trails are in different zones.,Absolutley,,
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,Telephone Loop,Biking,Jumping Pound Summit,Cutthroat Trout,Fresh Air,"Cut Blocks, Cattle and Gas wells",Mountain Bike from West Bragg to Barrier Lake,Enjoy a true wilderness without signs of industrial carnage,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, skate, camp, swim, picnic, fish",,"Try and buy out logging, grazing or oil and gas leases. Unlikely that 1 million$ will make any impact.",yes,,Resousce Extraction and Cattle grazing,,nature,no,"environment, recreation",Conserve it and let nature manage it.,Protect the environment surrounding the headwaters and tributaries of the Rivers. Designate those areas Protected Parks where no industrial activity can occur and limit access and extraction points to the waters for agrculture,When I visit K Country I am looking for a wilderness experience without any commercial venture.,"Tourism, guiding, outfitters and the general public should have access for those activities that do not damage nor destroy the habitat. The multi use policy is a failure from a recreationist and conservation view",We need better management of the lands we have in order that they are sustained in their natural way and passed on to future generations,"Low impact activities ie hiking, biking, x country skiing are endangered and impacted by industrial activity. Have you ever come around the corner of an old fire road on your Mtn Bike and been nearly run down by a well site operator in his 4 x 4 Pick up?",If portions of K Country are deemed historically sacred then First Nations Should have a stewardship role to ensure future development and industrial destruction are eliminated,"What would you rather look at? A cutblock, flare stack or cattle, or undisturbed forest, mountain vistas Moose, deer or Elk?",It depends on what your definition is for manage? If logging is a form of management then I do not think so. It is perhaps time for a shift in thinking and realization that Natural ecosystems can manage themselves if given the chance,"Problem and should be stopped now. Overgrazing and habitat destruction are the net return to the public. Take a look at the Bragg Creek, Ranger Creek, Prairie Creek, Ford Creek, Iron Creek, Canyon Creek to name a few waterways that are deposited with muck and cow manure because access is not managed. Trails are pock marked with cattle hoof prints, making them impassable by bike or hiking. It is time for the government to employ their own Fish and Cows programs on our public lease lands or buy out the grazing lease holders on public lands and K Country.","Perhaps we need to calculate the net $ return to the economy, taking into account preservation or destruction ofNatural Capital' from all activities in K country including Tourism, and establishing policies that will generate the greatest return from these land in perpetuity, to the citizens of this province.","Management of these activities is necessary in order to prevent over harvesting. Given that, unless the habitat is better managed and preserved there may not be any hunting or fishing to be undertaken","It depends on what activities. Historically large trail runs, bike races have taken place without in my opinion a huge impact. However if we allow unrestricted camping, motorized ATV access we will end up with a mess. If any future development is to take place it should be small scale, eg back country type accomadation. Large hotels and golf courses are not needed. K country is close enough to Calgary that it is accessible for day trips for tourist operations",The time has come to eliminate the multi use designation allowing resource extraction and turn the whole of K country into a protected Park,Yes.,,The close proximity of K country to a major urban center is one of its greatest appeals. However it is time to re designate it as a Park and not a multi use area where resource extraction can continue.
yes,yes,occasionally,infrequently,,scrambling,,,,,,,"hike, bicycle, ski, climb, skate, camp, swim",,,,,,,,no,"environment, recreation",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,"'round moose loop (Sulphur Springs, Powderface, JP, Cox, Tom Snow)","Riding, hiking, photography, fresh air for the kids",Any summit where you can't see roads or human activity,gotta love the grouse,"the solitude, 20 minutes from home",development,first time down the north side of Cox Hill - such splendid views and varied vegetation,"ride, hike, enjoy being away from development","hike, run, bicycle, camp, swim, picnic, site-see",,"Nothing (to the park). Build the Great Wall of Kananaskis to keep mean people out. But seriously, invest the money for long-term maintenance of sustainable trails for recreation and reduce development.",no,"Erosion control, proper trail building",Trucks and backhoes,Sustainable trail development (volunteer trail building can only do so much...),recreation,no,"environment, recreation",Reduce development and industry. Keep it a backcountry destination for local recreation (the Banff area is good for tourists).,Stop trying. Leave the watershed alone.,Less people. Let's not make this into another amusement park. This should be kept as a mostly wild and natural area.,"Cooperative multi-use between cyclists, horse riders, runners and hikers seems to work. Keep the gas-powered stuff out.","Minimal facilities keep it a backcountry-style destination. The only on-going development should be sustainable, erosion-controlling, natural dirt trails.",A small herd of cattle can destroy a trail in 10 minutes flat (this has been witnessed many times). Trail maintenance for recreation and agriculture don't mix well. Industry generally destroys the world around it and should kept out - for our safety and enjoyment of the natural area.,Keep Kananaskis a public land for the recreation and enjoyment of all.,"Critical. If it doesn't feel like the backcountry, we've done something wrong.",The eradication of the forest through logging doesn't bode well for its health. The removal of trees should be limited to clearing a sparse network of trails.,All the trail maintenance in the world can't keep up with a few head of cattle. Rain and hooves render trails unusable.,We should stop denying the impact development has on the future of adjacent communities. More research won't make people care.,,"Some non-profit events can help keep Kananaskis interesting to a broader audience, but commercial use should be stopped.",,,Sustainable trail maintenance (and the reduction of trail destruction by cattle and logging).,Kananaskis is a middle ground between the relentless development of Calgary and the severely restricted use of the National Parks (e.g. Banff park).
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,Tom Snow & Powderface,Mountain Biking,All of it!,Wild Horses,The scenery and trees,the logging,Mountain Biking & post ride picnis with friends,countine recreation,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, swim, picnic",,"Invest it in maintaining the way it is today prevent deforestation, keep it for future generations to enjoy also!",yes,a succint plan,any more development,logging - stop it,nature,no,environment,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,N/A,Ice and rock climbing,All over,Cougar,"The mountains, rivers and forest",Commercial intervention,Rock climbing the Fold.,Carry on my activities undistrurbed.,"hike, bicycle, climb, camp, fish",,Ensure it stays as it is.,yes,Control on the commercialism.,Logging,The desires of the public in Alberta. Listen to them.,recreation,no,"environment, recreation",Leave well alone. Nature will and has always taken care of itself.,Stop polluting the Bow River at Ghost Dam with powered watercraft.,Nothing I reward myself with the views and senery whilst climbing.,The public for recreational purpoesa and others that do not damage the status quo.,NO.,Yes.,Do not know. Really have not had any interaction with them in K-country. Always felt they are not interested.,Paramount.,NO.,That's fine.,No.,Good.,Less.,NO.,Yes.,None.,The whole area is beautiful as it is. Logging is an eyesore.
yes,yes,occasionally,infrequently,any back country trails,hiking or cross country skiing or mountain biking or canoeing,Kananaskis River,,"drives, hikes and the views from the river and lakes",ATV's nearby at Mclean Creek,mountain biking and canoeing,keep doing all of the outdoor activities I love in a beautiful place!,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp, picnic, site-see",canoeing,PROTECT IT - put it into resources that would increase the level of protection of the whole area Educating the public I might also change the bathrooms - most are EXTREMELY stinky,yes,Don't know,"Destruction of the natural resources (logging, hunting)",More sustainable practices AT LEAST,nature,no,environment,Protect it. Educate the public (especially the users) and decision makers.,Protect it. Educate the public (especially the users) and decision makers.,Perhaps all of this could be looked at and improved.,Not sure.,Yes - more sustainable facilities - better bathrooms.,Yes.,Unknown.,Very important.,Do not know enough but I doubt it.,Depends on how they use it.,YES. And in the meantime we need to protect it.,Good as I am sure there are good reasons for this.,It depends - everyone has some impact but this depends on size of group and their activities. Everyone should be practicingLeave No Trace'.,Not sure.,YES.,,"Alberta is fast becoming the sacrificial lamb - we need to save SOME areas and Kananaskis makes it high on my list because of it's dynamic of being so beautiful and wild, and yet attracting many people from nearby on a regular basis (potential for education is high). People need to connect with nature and become engaged in protection of wild places. It's not just about US - the place is an important wildlife corridor - but in terms of being selfish - WE need wild places for our own health and recreation..."
no,yes,frequent,frequent,Mist Ridge,Hiking,Highwood Valley,Any,The fact that it is not all a park,Bragg Creek Townsite,Hiking,Hiking,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp",,Build and upgrade hiking trails. Improve trailhead parking facilities. Properly pave Highway #68 and Powderface Road to improve road safety and eliminate dust and maintenance costs.,yes,A cohesive overall plan... too damn many little parks.,"ATV's,Dirt Bikes, Monster Trucks","Too much administration, not enough trail workers.",recreation,no,recreation,"A comprehensive management plan that includes recreation, habitat protection,and forestry in balance that results in a mixture of habitats and forest cover, while generally protecting watershed and recreational values.","Improve human sanitation (toilet facilities), careful siting of forestry activities, elimination of gravel road surfaces, and water quality monitoring.","Maintain, improve and expand the recreational trail network.","Generally, yes...the multi-use policy is working. Wildlife populations are strong, there is a diversity of recreation, the forest mix is moving away from single age monoculture due to small scale forestry activity and old resource roads are getting a second life as part of trail networks.","Yes. The trail network needs more maintenance and additional official trail links need to be recognized (where good trails already exist unofficially), or constructed, where those links don't properly exist.","In some areas, I have concerns about the potential of sour gas due to oil/gas activity. Grazing activity has destroyed some trails in the Sheep Valley. Excessively extensive logging in the lower Highwood Valley is visually intrusive and was not necessary. This could have been done with less impact over a longer period.",Killing wildlife.,Relatively high... but it's not supposed to be a National Park. Think long-term and think about an evolving landscape. I'd rather see a bit of logging than a widespread pine beetle-wildfire disaster. Don't forget that most of the popular hiking/skiing areas are or were actively logged and or mined over the past 50 years. This is both why they have trails and why the areas have vegetation diversity.,"Generally, yes. In the lower Highwood, the recent logging has been too intensive and has focused too much on old-growth spruce-fir forest. There is also too much emphasis on complete clear-cut logging, rather than on species based selective logging. For example, most areas with at-risk aged pine forest have an understory of 10-30 year old spruce trees. If the bulk of the pine were removed but many of the spruce were left standing, we would be left with a young spruce forest.","Grazing is a necessary part of the healthy life cycle of rough fescue grass lands. Without grazing, aspen and pine forest would take over the grassy areas and habitat for other ungulates will be lost. We have two alternatives: grazing by cattle or re-introduction of bison. I'm OK with either option, but at the present time, cattle are more easily managed. In some wet areas, such as side valleys in the Sheep area, cattle movement has destroyed trails and had a negative impact on water courses.",All of the above.,"Hunting & fishing should be managed in the Forest Land Use areas, including some restrictions, based on habitat and wildlife management needs. However, there is no need to ban these activities.","There should be realistic limits on group events, but the access for small group (10-15) trips by commercial operators should continue to exist.","YES! Many of the boundaries within K-Country make no sense to travellers on the ground. The plethora of nearly identical Provincial Parks, Wildland Parks, PRA's, etc should be simplified into a much smaller number of areas that make sense in a geographical and ecological context. This means combining the varioud Don Getty, Bluerock and Elbow Sheep Parks, Peter Lougheed and Spray Park and some of the Bow Valley Protected Areas. It may also mean extending some boundaries into the Forest Land Use Zones, where it makes sense. However, a mix of levels of protection and management should remain.",Identify those location and include them within protected areas.,"Generally, manyunofficial' trails need to be formally recognized as official trials and then be properly signed and maintained.","The most interesting and valuable thing about K-Country is that it is a multi-use, multi-function area that puts a strong emphasis on access and recreation. The best thing about it is that it is NOT all managed as a highly restricted park. This diversity and the freedom to explore is much more interesting than the boring National Parks!"
no,yes,regularly,occasionally,Mt Kidd,hiking and mtn biking,Elbow Falls,all,the whole thing,the tag a tree signs,cliff jumping in Elbow Falls,play more golf,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, swim, picnic, site-see, horseback",golf,"Expand the multiuse facilities to include more camping and trailer spots, update and expand the facilities in the park - showers, bathrooms, stores and accomodations",yes,,Environmentalists,,all,yes,logging,"overall management of land, water, air and its uses","ensure the natural filters (i.e trees and bogs etc) remain healthy and bug free. Expand the water treatment facilities in Calgary and west, have water meters on all homes in Calgary, Cochrane etc and charge all homeowners for water usage above a minimum threshold...to get them to be more water conservation conscious.",Less time working to give me more time to enjoy the area...,The current multiuse arrangement works well.,"more camping facilities, more golf courses",No,little,important,"Absolutely. Albertans are very lucky to have a company like Spray Lake Sawmills having the harvest rights in the area. Their employees are local, live in the areas and have a genuine concern for the wellbeing of the entire K-Country","I eat beef, so it is good.",I think the area has been studied to the point of redundancy,There are areas where restricted use and access are good - and required to protect the natural integrity of the area and the ecosystem.,Depends on the event or the activity,No,Yes,,
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,"many, many trails!","skiing, hiking, mountain biking","Highwood, Baldy area, Upper Lake area, Smith Dorrian","Grizzlies, goats, moose.",Peace and tranquility,Clear cut logging!,1st time I climbed Joffre.,Introduce friends to the outdoors I love,"hike, bicycle, ski, climb, camp",,Buy up logging rights and protect more land.,yes,Higher level of protection for foothills area,Motorized activities.,Logging in Kananaskis is a crime!,nature,no,,Minimize or eliminate human activities that have a high impact.,"Minimize industrial and motorized activity in the watershed, carefully manage human impact.",I don't go there for events.,No. Logging is an activity that is completely incompatible with conservation and recreation.,Facilities (camping for example) that minimize bear / human encounters.,"Very much concerned about industrial activities, especially logging and (less so) drilling.",I don't know.,Very.,NO! Clear cutting of forests is NOT good management!,"Cattle have a negative impact on the wilderness, but it is relatively small.",When is the last time an ecological study of the entire area was done?,Fishing and hunting have managed according to proper ecological science.,"No, as long as the groups go into areas that can handle their activities.","Establish a park in the Elbow, Sheep and Sibbald areas.",Yes.,Greater protection.,"What's wrong with Kananaskis is the multi-use areas do NOT belong here anymore. Wilderness is the most precious thing we have on this planet, and it must be protected ABOVE the interests of industry and recreation. Can I receive an ELECTRONIC copy of the administration draft plan?"
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,jumping ridge/ cox hill,mountain biking,,,the open natural space un touch by humans for the most part,"the oil rigs, tree deforstation",every time i go,"hike, mountain bike, camp, ski",bicycle,,it needs to be a protected are maybe some thing BLM land down in the us,yes,,,,recreation,no,environment,have protected lands with a healthy balance of recreation and wilderness area,stop using our limited water supply for industry such as oil rigs,to find away that it can stay what it is now. Stop further industry from destroying the landscape,"The multi use areas seem to work fine. All 4x4 and bikers, hikers seem to get alone well and have mutual respect for each other",no,concerned about the industrial activities,,extermley,"not currently,",not a concern at this point,no,"good, restricted more that is the only time i feel unsafe in k-country is hunting season",,"yes, expansion to protect our natural landscapes for further generations to come, with provincial help",yes,,That it is a protected park that can be logged and have oil wells on.....only in alberta would we have such issues
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,elbow loop,mountain biking,,bears,"forests, clean rivers, mountains","clear cut forests, torn up land for resource development",,continue to enjoy nature,"hike, bicycle, ski, climb, skate, camp, horseback","canoe, kayak","clean up the mess made by resource exploitation, get rid of the signs of development that are already there.",yes,Adequate enforcement (park wardens),"lumber companies, gas and oil development, cattle",too much emphasis on economic gain for single companies. Requires government will to fix.,nature,no,"environment, recreation",Stop development and resource exploitation. Get the cattle out of the wilderness.,stop logging No more cattle Better enforcement of rules on road and pipeline construction near streams.,No logging. Probably need some better parking facilities to accommodate the number of users during the summer.,"Multi-use is not working. There are fare more people trying to use the areas who are affected by the logging, than the number of people who benefit from the logging.",The campgrounds and parking lots are overcrowded in the summer. Both could probably be expanded.,"Yes, I'm concerned about my safety from the sour gas wells in the area, as well as from the effects of logging on the water and air and aesthetics of the area.","Unfortunately, I have seen only the negative sides of the First Nations use. They are as bad or worse abusers in terms of disrespect for the land, garbage left behind, animals shot out of season etc, than the non-First Nations users.",Very important.,"No. The forest is being managed as a crop: the downside being that this makes it seem right to harvest the crop and clear cut the trees occasionally. This disregards the importance of the trees to the rest of the forest dwellers, as well as the environment in general.",The cattle compete with other animals for grass and space. They are problem for wildlife in the area. They are also a problem for recreational users: their feet chew up the trails especially in and near water.,,Restrictions are good.,Less access for large groups and commercial operators,"Not sure about boundaries, but the mandate should be changed. I'd rather have a park than multi-use area.","Yes, the cultural, historical and palaeontological resources are important and worth protecting. They are less important than the environment itself, but more important than resource exploitation.",,"The problem with K-Country is the idea that we can have a multi-use area that keeps all users happy. This concepts allows for roads, wells and pipelines to be built anywhere within the area and trees to be logged anywhere within the area. A better idea would be to dedicate a certain area where logging and oil and gas development can occur, and another area (let's call it apark') where no resource exploitation of any sort is allowed."
yes,yes,regularly,infrequently,I've hiked Mount Baldi multiple times,Scrambling,,,Mount Joffre Area,The golf courses and development around Ribbon Creek,Climbing mount Northover,"Hike, snowboard, scramble, fish,","hike, bicycle, ski, fish",,I would protect more of the land around Kananaskis and maybe build some more hiking trails.,yes,The trees where the golf courses now.,The golf course where the trees used to be,,nature,no,tourism,Protect as much of the surrounding area as possible from unsustainable resource development,Protect the watersheds.,"Maybe a few more maintained hiking trails ( for instance, down the valley to Mount Lougheed).",Everyone that wants to do non-powered tourism.,No,Yes.,,Extremely,Mostly,This is stupid. It's lousy land for foraging and hurts out watersheds.,,Good.,No,"Yes, expand them. It's one of the most successful parks in the province. Make it bigger.",yes.,No.,
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,All trails from West Bragg Creek area,"Walking, jogging and horse riding",All trails from West Bragg Creek area,all wildlife,"the trails, the wilderness, animals and the trees",trucks that destroy the roads and construction and destruction of bridges,horse riding with friends,"continue to enjoy the trees, wildlife and views","hike, run, horseback",,Build seperate bike trails as riders are inconsiderate - come up behind horses without warning - spook horses,no,Provincial Park designation to protect area,"trucks, drilling, logging, construction/destruction - cows as they are aggressive",Provincial usage guidelines - Shell leaving a mess of the roads,nature,no,,Stop logging and keep heavy equipment away from area,Dont' know,"Eliminate the cows, they are aggressive and chase people",No - too many conflicting priorities,Better guidelines and bike trails,Yes - cows chasing me,Whatever role they want,"Very important, that's why I moved out to West Bragg Creek",No - clear cut logging is being allowed,Problem - cow pies all over trails and they chase people,Not sure,Yes,Not sure,Yes make it a Provincial Park,Definitely,"Define the usage guidelines based on conservation, recreation and tourism",
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Jumping Pound / Cox Hill,Biking,Kananaskis,Bears,"Proximity to Calgary, Lakes, best trails",Logging,Everytime I ride Jumping Pound / Cox Hill,Learn how to XC ski,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, camp",,Bigger information/tourist center.,no,Nothing,garbage,,nature,no,environment,,Keep it clean,Leave it alone,yes,No,yes,,very important,so far - unless all this logging continues.,"no problem, but not a benefit.",,very good,same or less.,,yes,,
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,those that reach above treeline,mtn biking; hiking; X-country skiing,everywhere,large and small mammals,the natural beauty,"machinery, higher developed areas such as compressor plants",too many to list,"physically exhilarating activities, tarvel long distances without incursion by development/destructi","hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see",,ensure good toiler/garbage and recycling at existing camps/trailheads -ensure good signage at trailheads -support X-country ski patrol and possibly hike/bike patrol in summer,yes,,large scale development - lodges that cater to overnight and are resort in style,logging,recreation,no,"environment, recreation, guiding, film",don't take their current environment away from them; it' spretty simple really; leave it alone; the concept of man needing to manage everything is very misguided.,don't pollute it; curtail development on it,,"there are plenty of motirized vehicle areas now, and they need their area too, but I don't think they need any more",if facilities mean permanent large structures and lodges/resoiorts - then definitely no,more concerned about the future: the impact these activities will have,it should be paramount; first nations should be a part of any discussion about the future of kananaskis,natural is beauutiful,the fact it is being managed at all may suggest no; management seems to be giving in to the wishes of the logging industry,"I can' tsee how grazing is ever a benefit other than to the cattle rancher. I understand some of these leases have been in place for sometime. My suggestion is honour them, of course, but when they run out, don't renew",,good,not if they wish to establish large permanent facilities,,yes,,
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,many,"hiking, mt. biking, x country skiing",west bragg and sibbald areas,seeing any wildlife is a thrill,"untouched, natural landscapes","cut lines, clear cuts and logging roads",don't think I've every not had fun there,not worry about being hit by a logging truck,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp, site-see",,Protect it from commercial/industrial use forever.,yes,lately? some trees,logging and industrial use,Kananaskis (all of it) should be protected forever as a park,nature,yes,"environment, recreation",Eliminate industrial use. No motorized recreation.,Eliminate industrial use.,Eliminate industrial use.,Multi use recreation policy works. Industrial use should be eliminated.,Proper maintenance of what already exists would be fine.,yes. Logging trucks. Impact on water quality.,"Hopefully, stewardship of the land.",Very. That's why people go there.,No.,"I would prefer it if they didn't. Water quality etc. But if it's done in a sustainable way, then it's acceptable.",If the information was made more available to visitors it would help them appreciate what we have.,Good.,Less.,Just make it a park.,Yes.,No.,
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,Jumpingpound ridge/prairieview/baldy,Mountain biking,,,Bike trails and scenery,,I ride K-coutry several times a week all summer long. Every ride is great.,Continue riding without mistaking it for Saskatchewan.,bicycle,,Hire a trail crew that understand what proper maintenance is. Biking provides a lot of money to the region yet the trails are not maintained properly or destroyed altogether.,yes,More/better trails,,,recreation,no,"environment, tourism, recreation",,Leave the environment the way it is...it evolved that way for a reason.,I enjoy it as it is but it vcould always use more frequent trail maintenance.,Everybody should have access as long as they are not destroying anything.,We do not need more structure-type facilities (no more buildings) but additional trails that are properly built would be great. That doesn't mean crushed rock or pavement but narrow single track trails.,,,It is a worlwide tourism destination so I would say it is pretty important.,From teh klatest photos of the Baldy area I would say no.,It does not appear to do much serious damage.,,,,The area needs to be protected for tourism/recreation.,Yes,,
,,occasionally,occasionally,Tom Snow,"biking, skiing",,bears,sunrise over the mountains,roads,,,"ski, skate, picnic, site-see, study, work",,Keep clear cut logging out of the park,yes,,Logging,Logging. do not allow clear cuttting in the park,nature,no,"environment, tourism, recreation","Keep people out. Baring that, keep vehicles to a minimum",I am unfamiliar with watershed but I do recall that logging is linked to increased sediment in surrounding rivers.,,Yes it is working,,I am concerned about industrial and agricultural activities in the park,,Very Important,"No, clear cut logging is beginning in areas.",,Yes,Good,Less access to commercial operators an large groups,,Yes,,
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Upper Kananaskis Lake,Hiking / Cross country skiing,all,all,much less busy than national parks,human development,University Ecology field course at research station,hike and cross counrty ski,hike,,Buy out any private lease / land holders and stop all further human development. Ensure safe roads and upkeep on current washroom and educational infrastructure. Maintain current hiking / ski trails and selected camp sites.,yes,The political will to preserve the area as a park!,"Hunting, logging, motorized vehicles.","Our attitude - need to value wild spaces as they are, not as a resource to be mined / logged.",nature,no,environment,Halt all logging / mining / gas exploration. Restrict motorized vehicle access. Halt all activities that interfere with watershed quality.,"No motorized vehicles within 500 m of open water, (bridges on main access roads excepted), no logging, limit access to water from livestock (to ensure bank integrity).",Limit human development - we go there to get away from people and development.,"Public access should be limited in terms of use (low impact use only), and with regards to sensitive areas (to minimize negative interactions with wildlife such as grizzlies).","We need to maintain some current camp grounds and hiking trails, but that's it!","I am VERY concerned about the impacts of INDUSTRIAL activities - some grazing is not a bad thing, but there should be no industrial use of this area.","They are members of the public, and should respect the same uses as the rest of us.",Extremely important.,"Clear cut logging is not forest management, it is economic managment. All logging requires access roads and disturbs wildlife habitat and should not be permitted in this area.","Provided it is carefully managed so as not to over-graze or interfere with wildlife habitat, grazing can be very beneficial.",Knowledge about the ecology of the area is always a good thing.,"This is good, there should be no hunting at all in the area.","There must be strict guidelines about all individuals and groups using the park to adhere to low impact standards, any operator or special event must respect these standards.",,Yes.,"We need solid political protection for the park, and meaningful enforcement along with public education.",
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,spray lakes,hiking/skiing/snowshoeing,spray lakes,"moose, birds",the vistas,logged/burnt/dead forest,snowshoeing in the winter,enjoy the peace and scenery,"hike, run, ski, camp, swim, site-see",,enact better control of entrance to the park/enforcement of park policies. establish conservation areas that are not accessible by people.,yes,better control over park usage.,"mechanized vehicles, resource exploitation",tighter controls on park usage.,nature,no,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,any mtb allowed trail from bow valley to cataract,mountain biking,top of prarieview overlooking barrier lake,bears...when not too close of course,the view from any of the summits,clearcut blocks,anytime i ride there,mountain bike,bicycle,snowshoe,establish a protected park and infrastructure. establish a funded and dedicated trail maintenance crew. educate and promote tourism.,yes,kananskis is beautiful. all we need is a protected recreation area.,clearcutting,"land managment needs reorganization, to establish balance between all user groups.",recreation,yes,oil&gas,an appropriate and balanced land usage plan.,water supplies and watersheds must be protected at all costs. this should be non-negotiable for ANY user group.,"nothing, i like the area the way it is. relatively untouched.","everyone can have access. there is room for small scale economics (agriculture, oil/gas, and logging). there is room for all recreants. the current separation of motorized and non-motorized is working brilliantly.","no, the area should remain as untouched by commercial interests as possible.",of course! these are potentially dangerous and destructive activities. there is a way to balance these issues however.,"they are users in every sense (economic, land and recreational). their opinions and input are extremely important.",very. the most visually appealing kananaskis will bring in the most tourists...and is also the most environmentally sound kananskis.,mostly. i feel the economic users are being given precedence over recreational users which is inappropriate. maybe this would change if recreants became consumers (user fees?),the ranchers are very compatible with recreants. i have had only good experiences with ranchers and their cattle herds (other than some minor trail damage).,tourism! let's make the money that way and allow recreation rather than logging the area.,all users may face restrictions provided they are reasonable and stem from safety or environmental concerns. this is part of a balanced user plan.,"k-country should remain outside the reach of commercial interests, except to promote the area itself.",,within reason and agreement of all user groups.,a dedicated and well funded trail maintenance staff!,"k-country is a unique and accessible backcountry. it is beautiful and occasionally remote, and my favorite place in the world. logging it clear is a travesty for both users and the environment. creating a national park and disallowing access would be an equal tragedy. there is room for all user groups if the plan is fair and balanced."
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,cox hill area/various mountains,mountain biking/ice climbing/ski touring,the view from Barrier Lake fire look out,squirrel,anatural' playground so close to calgary,knowing that the new logging in kananaskis is an oxymoron in terms of forest management,climbing/ice climbing/mtn biking,continue all winter/summer activities in a natural non-logged setting,"hike, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, swim, picnic, site-see",ice climbing,put it towards paying off the logging concessions,yes,enough proven evidence that cutting trees STOPS the spread of the beetles.,ATV use,the government priorities as usual. the gov would make a hell of a lot more money charging a fee,nature,no,recreation,let nature take its course without moronic humans thinking they can manage an ecosystem,"responsible water usage, preservation of ecosystem around the majority of our watershed","its great as it is as. All i need is a trail, or some snow and I'm satisfied","realistically, we can't say no to ATV'ers so it should be accessible to everyone but limit ATV use to certain areas like Mclean Ck.","i'm a purist. I don't need more info centers or tours to make kananaskis a better place. trail upgrades for hiking, cont'd admin of the parking areas/bathrooms etc","yes, Land slides onto access trails/roads that lie below steep logged areas is a concern.","they're in it for revenue, so they're biased towards resource development, through logging, gravel 0perations, etc.","very important. we don't, as humans shit in our backyard and leave it there for our friends and neighbours, so why would you want to cut down a lot of trees for a momentary monetary gain as compared to making tourism the prime resource.",apparently not,"problem.... for water quality, although i'm not aware of the numbers of grazing cattle that are allowed in kananaskis. cows can drink the water they crap in, we can't.",we need to learn more about tourism and especially ecology (specifically the pine beetle),Good,more access to commercial operators that will have a tourism stake in the area to show the government that we need to keep these lands pristine for bringing tourism dollars.,boundaries should be changed to include a protected Park!!,of course,expand picnic areas/upkeep trails for increased use.,
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,Baldy Pass trail,hiking and biking,Barrier Lake and area,"deer, moose, ungulates",The view of uninterrupted trees climbing up mountains,The Maclean creek area - all the ATVing,doing my fieldwork there (around Barrier Lake/Sibbald) this past summer,hike more without encountering clearcuts and logging roads,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp, swim, site-see, work",,"I would protect it all. I'd start replanting areas that had been cut, and I'd close off some of the logging/ oil roads. I'd make certain areas off-limit to tourists and recreational users in order to ensure that some areas were left completely alone.",yes,strict use policies. Politicians who care.,"Cows being pastured in forest, oil, gas, and forestry companies, ATVs.",Our respect for this area and everything that lives in it.,nature,no,"environment, tourism, recreation, film",By restricting use to certain (small) areas only.,Not log anywhere near them - this causes the watersheds to lose stability. The pollutants and debris that arise from logging also affect water quality.,,"No, it's not. The fact that ranchers can let their cows wander through the forest is ridiculous. Logging and oil and gas operations are also extremely invasive.",,I would be concerned about my safety in an area that was being actively logged - this restricts my travel in Kananaskis country.,I wish I knew enough about this to comment.,Very important - gashes in the landscape due to cleacut logging are very unappealing.,It's absolutely not. I can't believe all the logging that's going on - and in areas frequented by recreational users. The public will be astonished to see the destruction that took place over the winter when they take their bikes out to the trails this Spring...,"It's a huge problem! Two of my five study sites were destroyed by cows this summer (2007). I had no idea that ranchers were allowed to let them wander wherever they wanted. I couldn't even find my plots due to the trampling, mcuh less collect data on moose and deer pellet groups.","Ecology. If people understood the delicate balance that exists between species (plant and animal) in the Kananaskis region, they may be driven to protect the area from logging.",This is good.,Less access - see previous comments.,"Yes - by assessing which areas are key ecologically, we can prioritize which areas need high levels of protection.",Yes.,,
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,paddy's flats/own trails back of house that back on K country,"hiking, xc skiing, climbing",prairie creek,"wolf, moose, elk, cougar",trees,oil & gas plant,climbing,camp,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, swim, horseback",,create/maintain sustainable pathways. create a national park and conserve it.,yes,,atv and 4x4 trucks,,all,no,"environment, recreation, oil&gas","I realize in the growing population and growing needs of this nation and world for that matter, we cannot expect the Kananaskis to be completely devoid of people and interactions thereof but there has to be some accountability and sustainability so that we have a future. I propose that we have the Kananaskis set aside as a national park so that we can control the impact that we have. Having vehicles and ATV in the countryside should be regulated. if we are to have resources taken from the k coutry it should be selective so that other activities can be maintained, such as hiking, biking, and climbing. There are compromises and ways to make this an environment that can be shared.","inpact assessment. selective logging is probably the safest, and most ecologically sound way to ensure that we don't have issues with our water supply. additional the time of the year should be considered for water run-off, and spawning.",not sure there needs anything to be done.,"we cannot expect the Kananaskis to be completely devoid of people and interactions thereof but there has to be some accountability and sustainability so that we have a future. I propose that we have the Kananaskis set aside as a national park so that we can control the impact that we have. Having vehicles and ATV in the countryside should be regulated. if we are to have resources taken from the k coutry it should be selective so that other activities can be maintained, such as hiking, biking, and climbing. There are compromises and ways to make this an environment that can be shared.",no,as long as everyone is kept accountable and is reasonable in their use - no.,good question.,very - it is what the kananaskis is all about - WILDERNESS,not with clear cutting - there are other alternatives that obviously haven't been considered.,they do damage a lot. I think it is more of a problem.,Definately. I think there is a lack in consideration of the ecology and the impact we have in K country.,"I think there should be restrictions in general in all uses to have sustainability, and a future for all.","depends on the activity - if it is a road bike race or something that is on marked trails and the event cleans up everything then, no.",not sure but if it will protect k coutry for future - yes. how - i am not qualified to answer this.,definately.,,"there4 is so much diversity in geology, landscape, ecology, etc - it is wonderful to be at the top of a mountain and enjoy the sea of green - it is rejuvenating and exhilerating to experience something wild and seemingly untouched. wrong - that we don't care to maintain it for years to come in a more environmental and ecologically sound way other than clear cutting. money ISN'T everything."
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,COX HILL,mountain bike,COX HILL,CATS MOOSE BEARS,MOUNTAINS,CLEARCUT,mountain biking,mountain bike,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp, swim, fish",,pay asshole loggers to stay home,no,armed gaurds,logging companies,communication between gov't,nature,no,"environment, tourism, recreation",no industry,no logging,leave it alone,nature lovers only,no,no,none,very,"no, not when you clearcut. We have the technology to selective log.",problem.Cattle are damaging to environment.,ecology,Yes,no industry,no,yes,no new facilities.,"Stop clearcuts. If it must be logged use selective methods.I think its too late already, they ruined a beautiful place."
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,Chester Lake,Back country skiing,Roberston glacier,Moose,The silence,The casino,Powder turns on skis in Commonwealth Creek,Show my kids the beauty,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, swim, picnic",,"Maintain the trails, and publicise environmental awareness.",yes,Not much !,Logging companies,,nature,no,"environment, recreation, oil&gas",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,regularly,infrequently,Baldy,biking,,,mountains,roads/logging,biking,continue to experience the outdoors,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp, picnic, site-see",,,yes,,,,recreation,no,environment,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Jumping Pound Ridge,"Mountain Bike, Kayak, Hike",All through the Kananaskis,Bear,Pristien valleys,"Clear Cut Logging, Smokers",Annual Mountain Bike trek between Barrier Lake and West Bragg Creek,"Leisure activites, outdoor adventure activities","hike, bicycle, ski, camp",Kayak,?? Prevention of commercal activity.,no,Nothing,Commercial Developmant.,,nature,no,oil&gas,Limit commercial activity to projects that will protect or improve the natural state.,Stop unnatural activity that creates large adverse effects on the waterways,"Keep the ATV,s out and fine smokers who butt out on the ground",Public access for non motorized non commercial activity.,"No, keep maintaining what is there","Safety no, Impact Yes",None. They have there own land,Very very,No.,Niether if managed correctly,We know enough now to know commercial logging is not in the best intrest of the evironment,Good,Status Quo,???,Yes,???,Stop clear cut logging and further development of for profit commercial activity.
yes,yes,frequent,infrequently,"All of them, Baldy, West Bragg Creek Area etc.",Mountain Biking,,,The Landscape / natural beauty of the forest,LOGGING/ CUT BLOCKS,,Continue with what I do already,"hike, run, bicycle, camp, picnic, site-see",,Make a park to protect it from future logging and development,yes,,,,recreation,no,recreation,,,NO Logging,,,,"There should be none, One Casino to the corridor of Banff/ Kananaskis is more then enough thank you...","Of the utmost importance, peoeple do not travel to places to see cut blocks, they go for the nature",Not if large amounts are being logged no!,Benefit,yes,Good,"Less access for commercial operators, more for special nedds etc.",,YES,a park,
yes,yes,frequent,frequent,"Crystal Line in West Bragg, Fullerton Loop on 66",Hiking,Kananaskis,"Deer, Moose",Trees and mountains,"logging, garbage",Rafting down the elbow river from the falls to Redwood Meadows,"Cross Country Ski, Hike, Bike, have it preserved for future generations","hike, run, bicycle, ski, skate",camping,Make more trails and better upkeep of the trails. Some trails have alot of dead trees and signage needs to be kept up.,no,"Nothing, I love it just the way it is","Oil equipment, logging",better trail upkeep,nature,no,environment,"Protect it, give them a place that is protected from industry and development","Reduce the amount of water the city uses would be a good start. Low flow toilets, water meters, etc. Take care of the environment upstream from the city.","Guided Hikes, Activities and Events","I think Kananaskis needs to be protected from industry (logging, oil). I've seen the aftermath of devestation these two industries have in an area.","I think expanding some of the campsites would be a good idea, and I really miss the day use pinic areas that had fire pits/stoves.","I'm not concerned about my safety in Kananaskis, it's where I go to recharge. I am concerned on the impact logging and oil has on the area.","I think First Nations have an opportunity for economic development. From creating campsites on their land, to hosting guided tours and seminars.",Crucial!,"No, I've seen the effects of logging and the years it takes for the area to recover.","I think it's a benefit, there are many open meadows and they help keep the fire hazard down.",Ecology and Tourism would a start.,"Good, I don't want to worry about getting shot by a hunter while I'm hiking and I think there are enough areas in Alberta to hunt and fish, why not protect people and the environment in Kananaskis","Less access for large groups, the garbage, lack of facilities would be two good reasons. I have no problem if commercial operators mean outdoor adventure companies. I think hiking/biking/climbing and rafting tours would be fine.","Yes, make it a provincial park and protect it. From West Bragg down 762.",Yes,Bigger parking lot at Elbow Falls.,K-Country is unique in that it has survived as a natural space being so close to a major city. It is a place that Calgary residents flock to. It is easy and quick to get to and it has survived because of the work of volunteers and the respect visitors have for this area. I would rather visit K-Country then go to Banff.
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Galitea,Snowshoeing,Tombstone,Moose,Views & purity,Human impact locations (ie. logging etc.),Take school groups there twice annually to expose them to arguably the most beautiful place on earth,as is,"hike, ski, camp, picnic",snowshoe,"Majority to education (appreciation, respect, appropriate use etc.)",yes,increased public education,anything with negative environmental impact,,nature,no,,No logging,minimize environmental impact,,"At present permits and trail limits seem to target the wrong clientele. School groups are most often appropriate users - trail limits SEVERELY affect what schools are able to offer in KC. Increased adult presence results in increased sub costs etc., while the trail limits split groups up which, in my opinion, increases chances ofproblems'. Increased potential for problems results in increased liability potential....",Fine as is,Yes - industrial and agricultural activities significantly impact the area,Consultation and valued input - not necessarily sitting on decision making panels,"Extremely! Often with naturewhat you see, is what you get'. For exampple, if a mountainside has been logged, the visual appeal is severely compromised.",To a certain extent - yes. The concern being the management of KC from now into the future.,"Environmentally a benefit, for users I can see some believing it is a problem",Ecology,Good,As is - commercial operators and their policies and practices must continue to be monitored and enforced,No,Yes,Continue to promote public education and appropriate use,
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,powderface,mountain biking,,,proximity and views,clearcut and logging,mountain biking and x-country skiing,mountain bike and road bike,bicycle,,maintain the natural habitat,yes,trail maintenance,resource development,,nature,no,,discourage logging,keep a watershed and quality control water,more trails and road closures to vehicles,,,,,,,not a problem,yes... impact of industry on the environment,good,less access for large groups and commercial operators.,,,,
yes,yes,occasionally,regularly,"Poccoterra, Chester Lake all of em!",x-country skiing and hiking,listed above,"its all imporatant , from nutrient cycling to big bull moose",The Kananaskis - the same trail is never the same,access roads,every time is fun,enjoy it for myself and leave it as the HOME it should be for wildlife & climate reg,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp, swim, picnic, study, work",,"I'd turn it into a reserve and a save it as a climate sink, why on earth they are logging it when there is a forecasted housing drop and the US is on the brink of collapse because of the surplus proves to me there is NO stategic level sustainable planning",yes,Enforcement,Mass development,wholistic business,nature,no,environment,Strategic sustainable planning that does not creat more access! NO net loss in the area is a great start,Ensure no siltation from roads (fish fry habitat) and don't place roads within 500 m of water course (to avoid spills),I just like how it reminds me that I'm a part of nature to- that I belong and that I'm also a steward.,"OF course its multii-use policy, get ready for stakeolder consulstations galore!",I don't beleive so,"Yes of course- there is always an impact, from spill, to waste managment to domestic-wild animal disease trasfer.",The orignial stewards- they should always be consulted for opinion,Not as important as ecosystem health,ITs seems no- why it logging en masse going on?,"Potentially good, but there should be strict diseaes screening to ensure cattle don't spread disease to wildlife (eg- TB, Brucellosis etc)","I'm sure the more info the better, but ecology and ecosystem health is the mainstay- wtithout it, there is no foundation for the other interests","Yes good, animals need a break too.",It depends on there footprint- if it can be kept small and is respective of the environment then maybe,"I don't know- Connect with Banff national Park?? AS wel, there should be more economic tarrifs to support no net loss",Yes- of course- this is canadaian heritage,Broad stakeholder communication,"Its a natural area, that is being viewed as a resource to be exploited."
yes,yes,occasionally,occasionally,Buller Pass,Cross-country skiing and hiking,Somewhere sunny next to a lake,Moose,"The mountains, meadows, lakes, streams, and forests.",Clearcuts and off-road vehicle sights,Skiing at Pocaterra,"Show it to my grandchildren in 40 years, completely unchanged","hike, bicycle, ski, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see",,I'd buy all of it and turn it into a park.,yes,"More wildlife officers/rangers, and better upkeep of facilities.",Clearcuts,The governments promise to the people. They have to start listening,nature,no,environment,Turn Kananaskis into a place for animals and the well being of the human spirit. (make it into a park),Turn Kananaskis or at least this part of Kananaskis into a park.,"When I go to use facilities in Kananaskis (camp sights, information buildings, and washrooms) I want to feel like they are being well kept and loved, not ignored or rundown which is how I sometimes feel.","The multi-use policiy was great for a while, but with such a growing population, it no longer works. Only recreation (except off road vehicles because they tear apart the trees and ground)and animals should be allowed in K-country.","Most facilities are doing just fine the way they are, but with more and more people visiting Kananaskis, new and/or better facilities might be a good idea in some places.",Cows in Kananaskis? I hate to think about what's being washed into our watershed from those cows. And Clearcuts on the pretty mountain sides? I am definately concerned about my mental health in this issue.,I can't decide for them what the First Nations should do- but if I were them I would be pretty mad at everyone destroying the landscape through logging/oil wells/agriculture/off-roading.,"The visual appeal is a big part of how people feel when the visit Kananaskis. If it looks ugly people won't feel as good or want to visit Kananaskis as much. This will affect the people themselves, and tourism.",No.,It's a problem.,"We need to know more about all of these things because industry effects tourism, tourism and agriculture effects ecology, and in turn ecology effects everything. We need to understand all these things better so we can use them or monitor them appropriately.",It's good to control the amount of fishing and hunting done- but only so animals remain stable and their species flourish.,It is pretty good the way it is.,YES!! We need a park in Kananaskis!,Yes. These things are important.,Not sure.,Kananaskis country is interesting because it is beautiful and diverse. In one day you can swim in an ice cold stream flowing through a mossy forest and within half an hour be climbing up so high you can see for miles. Kananaskis has wonderful wildlife aswell and a variety of plants on top of that. There is nothing wrong with the natural Kananaskis-what's wrong with it is what humans have done to it. Kananaskis's natural beauty needs to be preserved so it can be loved and appreciated for generations to come.
yes,yes,regularly,infrequently,Prairieview,mountain bike,Barrier Lake,,Sunset on top of prairieview,logging on Wildhorse Trail,every time I ride,Know the trails will be there forever,"hike, bicycle, ski",,Invest in trail maintenance and continue the program of building more sustainable bike trails,yes,nothing,logging,"Communication, Seek input and CARE",all,no,,To seek multistakeholder input and develop an intelligent longterm plan,I don't know. Can't see logging helps though,Stop logging the mountain bike trails!,Multi-use is a great idea. We just need to work to make it work.,"No, just more wisdom.",Yes,Don't know,Vital. It is a jewel,I don't know.,Fine by me. The more the merrier,yes,don't know,more if at all possible. I think the loss of Trans Rockies was short sighted. We can't ride a few bikes but logging's OK...?!,can't say,yes,None. Let's properly look after what we have first.,"It's beautiful, accessible and has large recreation options. What's wrong is that it's being hastily destroyed."
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,Cox Hill / Jumpingpound Ridge,mountain biking,Kananaskis,bears,the forests,logged areas,mountain biking with my friends many times each week,keep riding my favourite trails and create a park to preserve the trails,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, picnic",,Create a bigger trail system and a permanent park.,yes,,,,recreation,no,"environment, tourism, recreation, retail, guiding, film",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,tom snow south,mountain biking,,moose,,,,,"hike, bicycle, ski, climb",,create a trail system that is maintain without cattle on it,yes,,,,recreation,no,"environment, tourism, recreation",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,"I quite enjoy riding Tom Snow, Powderface and Elbow, and ski Telephone in West Bragg",Mountain biking (summer) and Cross-country Skiing (winter,Favourite place is difficult - there are so many!!,I love all the grouse and birds I see while skiing/riding,I love the tight valley views from the Prairie Link trail or from the top of Eagle Hill,The fresh logging at the end of Tom Snow,Every Wednesday in the summer riding with the SpinSisters MTB club,I would like to continue what I already do - I hope that the area does not develop any denser infras,"hike, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, picnic, study",bird watching,"Purachse a band of land around the outside of core rec areas and not allow any roads to pass across it, thereby proctecing the land within.",yes,,,,recreation,no,"environment, tourism, recreation, retail, agriculture, oil&gas","Limit the intensity of the various activites in the area (i.e. limit the number of wells drilled, the number of cattle grazing, the number and density of acres set aside for forestry etc...)",Develop polices like an Ontario Conservation Authority and limit all floodplain development and protect the surface quality of the entire watershed.,,"Up to now, the multi-use policy seemed fairly balanced, though the resource extraction seems to be winning over other uses at the moment.",,"I have been a bit suprised and concerned when encountering grazing cattle on a MTB trail, but the only safety concern i have is to do with logging and O&G trucks on the small roads driving fast when there are MTB on the roads between the trails.",,Quite.,"Again, until recently I would have said yes, it was being managed well. With the prospect of the bugwood, it seems like the winter last year and this year will be cold enough to destroy the larvae and the additional logging is unecessary.",It's interesting. I'm not sure if the added nitrogen and trampling are light enough to limit the damamge to the ecosystem. I am concerned when I see cattle with access to the streams and creeks for nitrogen enrichment of the aquatic environment.,,This is very nice. I am not fond of worrying about getting shot while I'm skiing or riding my bike in the woods.,,,Yes.,,
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Powderface creek,mountain biking,Kananaskis,"Deer, Bear","Nature, Trees, Lakes, Rivers and Wildlife",Clear cutting,Multi day hiking trip,Enjoy nature,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, horseback",,"Protect the natural state of park, not allow people to destroy it or develop it.",yes,,"Development, industry",,nature,no,"environment, recreation","Do not develop the area, do not clear cut, people are using enough of the part for our recreation(if it does not get clear cut) keep the places that are harder to get to that way so the wildlife has less intruders into their habitat",Limit the amount of cattle waste which gets into the rivers,Information centre has lots of great infomation. could post daily reports for K country on a website.,"it needs to be a protected natural area as we have destroyed so much of our wildlife areas. No more development, logging, or hunting alowed.",,I am concerned about the impact of industrial activities,,Very,when it is not being clear cut or developed it is well managed. when other things are allowed to happen which destroy k country that is not acceptable,it is a problem and a bennefit. The cattle can impact the watershed. However they have less of an environmental impact than development and industry.,,"I don't agree with hunting, I know that is a whole other discussion area that is heavily debated. I am unsure of how much hunting is allowed and therefore cannot comment. Other than to say any is too much in my opinion",,,YES,,
,,regularly,regularly,Nahahi Ridge and Prairie Mountain,hiking and skiing,Lillian Lake,all,It's close proximity to Calgary,logging destruction,peaceful hiking,Hike on all the trails,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp, swim, study",,Invest it and leave it the same,yes,,all this logging,,recreation,no,"environment, recreation, guiding",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,frequent,frequent,all of them,"xcountry ski,hike and bike",all over,"nature,deer,bear,birds",beauty animals fresh mountain air,"cut down trees,fumes from engines","fresh air,nature itself",everything but keep it the way it was meant to be,camp,"bike, hike, photography","I would preserve it and keep it beautiful, free from destroying from other humans who do not care. We were put on this earth to share it with wildlife but alot of us have past that boundary. Keep it beautiful, keep it safe, untouched and unscathed.",yes,nothing except preserveance,anything unnatural,protect it,nature,no,environment,preserve it and protect it,heavier fines for those who destroy it,tours and information to educate people to preserve the beauty,no because some people still destroy things,better upkeep and security patroling,"yes people destroy things,",not sure but I hope it is to protect it,very important especially for the environment,definite keep going forward,both,ecology should always be most important,good,yes be very controlled access for big groups,"yes, it needs to be looked as a whole and than protected with guide lines for use","yes no culture,history,palaeontology there is nothing",none,"the beauty, fresh air, the whole picture. needs more protection, tougher rules and regulations and penalties if behavior is taken"
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Prairie View,Mountain biking,,,Trees and mountains and lakes,clear cut patches,Mountain biking every week.,,skate,,,yes,,,,recreation,no,recreation,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,JP/Cox hill,moutain biking,mountains,moose,natural beauty,industry,mountain biking,mountain biking,"hike, bicycle, camp, picnic, site-see, fish",,"build more trials, have a full time trail crew.",yes,nothing yet,resource development raping to land,"none of the groups ie, bikers,hikers,horse riders seem to get along and want to work together",recreation,no,"tourism, recreation, guiding, film",by leaving their natural environment is and letting it run it couse,not destory the water shed,I think your on the right track here,"yes, but not very good. I don't think that the groups getting along very well. everyone fells the other groups are out to get them","I think they are good but I don't like what was done at elbow falls, takes away from the natural setting, starting to look like banff.",yes,don't know,"very big, why would some one want to come a visit if all they see is a waste land.",I think so,"they chew up the trails big time, mostly in the wet areas where they like to stay. and they crap everywhere!",nope,"good, to much of it will kill of all the animals, enough needs to be done to keep everything in check","I think access for bigger events is fine, but we don't need anymore stores or hotels.",don't really know,yes,more interactive centers,"been out in the natural rugged mountains blows my mind ever time I go. I don't want to lose any trails to someone making money. If the logging can't be stopped, maybe we need to look a getting them to put money back in to fix/ build what was destroyed. I am all for a paying user fee if it will keep thinks in good shape"
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Tie between Nihahi RIdge & Moose Mountain,Hiking & Mountain Biking,Some of the places off the beaten path... i.e. a couple kms off the highway,Don't have any.,The trees after a light snow fall,conflicts in an area that should be designated for recreation and protection (two compatible uses),Camping with friends & family. Introducing friends to the wonders of nature,,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp, picnic",,"make it the leading recreation destination in AB. When it was created it had the best of basic infrastructure. Nice access roads, great day use areas with well-kept facilities. That has all gone downhill.",yes,Full designation as a park,"4x4 ing, off road vehicles. any motorized transportation off the highways",maintenance needs to be there.,recreation,no,recreation,Ensure a diversity of protected areas where nobody's allowed.,"Keep the watershed fully in-tact. The forest is a huge filter, and I'm amazed that while the Bow river isfully allocated' the government is permitting the removal of vegetation that helps ensure seasonal flows and water quality.",nothing. I don't like too much programming. That's what Banff is for. Maybe more & better maps. And ONE CENTRAL WEBSITE for camp grounds & reservations!!,"No, it is not working. If the majority feels that forestry should be permitted in some areas, then designate some areas for ONLY forestry. But also designate areas for ONLY protection and ONLY recreation. rules need to be clear.",Just better maintenance of what we have.,No (to first question) and yes (to second question),"Don't believe there is any... They could help promote & educate what that land was used for hundreds of years ago, but I don't see them interested in that.",Very important.,"no, clear cutting is not good management of forest.",don't see that as a problem.,value to tourism.,"this is good. I see hunting much more compatible with clear-cuts, and fishing compatible with dirty water. I don't do either.",might open the area up to betterprotection' officially.,"Not sure why the whole area is called K-Country. Most people associate that with a park, and it should be. Areas outside of the park might be ok for multi use, but not in this area we call K-country, and probably not on the eastern slopes of the rockies.",yes,none,
,,regularly,occasionally,Moosepacker and area,"Mntn bike, hike and Picknick",All of it,diversity,Sky lines from sumits and ridges,Gas pipelines and pumping/flair staitions,"great bike rides, Powder days when Fortress was open","continue to mountain bike large variety of terain, ski, hike,Kayak, camp","hike, bicycle, ski, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, horseback",,"maintain trails and singage, concervation efforts",yes,bikinis,,,all,no,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,infrequently,infrequently,,skiing,lakes,moose,mountains,deforestation,camping,camp and ski,camp,,"I would ensure that water and forestation are maintained, fewer motor vehicles and more camp sites.",yes,,,,nature,no,recreation,"Limited development, well designed planning","Charge for water usage especially businesses, educate and reduce water consumption, use 2 flush toilets and gravity fed, low use toilets...",,To all responsible users,Place to relax from Alberta's pace,"Yes, stop all logging",None,As far as it reveals the beauty of nature,No,Potential problem to growth of natural species if over-run,Yes,Good,Less access by large groups and commercial groups,Establish them,To some degree,,"It is dramatic, nearby to Albertans"
yes,yes,regularly,infrequently,Trans Canada Trail / All of it,Mountain Biking,All of it,All of it,absolutely everything,"logging, anyone who comes to wreck it",riding my bike on a beautiful summer day,ride with trees,"bicycle, OHV, ski, climb, skate, camp, picnic, site-see, study",,"I dont think a million would be enough, but I would make it a protected park, and boot every single person who is looking to make money off of the land out.",yes,more and more trees,the people and equipment cutting down the trees,STOP CLEAR CUTTING,nature,no,"environment, recreation, guiding, film",By making Kananaskis a protected park and restricting the amount of people who can go there.,I dont know,nothing I love it already,,nope,I am very concerned about industrial and agricultural activities. I would hate to see this park ruined. I have many adult and childhood memories there.,,very,nope,I dont know much on this area. If the land is being destroyed then it is a problem. If the land is fine then there is not much of a problem.,yes,very good,MUCH LESS,"yes, I dont know how.",yes,nothing,
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,tom snow / elbow / elbow loop / telephone / prarie / powderface / ......,biking / x-country skiing / hiking / rock climbing / mountain climbing,west of Bragg Creek to Highway 40,wolf / moose /,mountains / natural setting,cut blocks,family activities,,"hike,ski,climb,skate,camp,picnic",,,yes,,clear cut logging,govenment has no focus on preserving or enhancing recreational facilities and opportunities,recreation,no,,late nature take its course,ensure no polution of water source,good public access to recreational information,,,,,The natural environment should be preserved,my overall impression is that there is considerable room for improvement,causes some conflicts in heavily used recreational areas,,hunting should be restricted around heavily used recreational areas - safety issue,There should be access for group activities. Commercial operators access should be considered after groups have been accomodated.,,yes,,
yes,yes,occasionally',regularly',,skiing',,Grizzly',mountains/lakes',clear cuts',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
no',yes,frequent',regularly',Allen Bill to West Bragg',mountain biking/hiking/x-country skiing',top of moose mountain',moose',trees/meadows',gravel roads',mountain biking with friends',,"picnic,site-see,horseback'","couldn't make above work. Ski, skate, camp,hike, bike, run, boat, swim, horseback ride'",buy the equipment needed for logging companies to selectively log and better help manage the forest over the long term.',yes,,,,nature',no',environment',,do not allow it to be polluted.',,,,during hunting season I worry about safety.',,massively.',,,all',necessary',,,yes,,"I'm not qualified to answer most of this or the above questions. I only have gut feelings to offer, I'm unaware of most of the details of the area. until recently, I thought K-country was a park.'"
yes,yes,regularly',select',sulphur springs & jumpingpound ridge',cycling',top of Cox Hill',all except the mosquitoes',the expansive views from the high trails',"clear cuts, and the access roads out past the West Bragg trails'",it's always fun - that's why I go',"escape from the city, get some exercise, and relax'","hike,run,bicycle,ski,camp'",,Preserve the natural beauty for recreational users;',yes,,,,recreation',no',"environment,recreation'","Don't know, but it is a worthy objective.'",Don't know.',Nothing',ranching & O&G limited to existing operations reduced road access Mclean creek users need to stay within the OHV area',a couple of strategically placed outhouses perhaps',,Don't know.',Critical',,"OK, as long as it is not excessive'",,Good',Mountain Bike and trail running races should be permitted to a certain extent.',,,,
yes,yes,frequent',regularly',"tom snow, moose packers'","hiking, running, mountain biking'",kanasksis',bear',trees and mountains',barren land',moutnian biking on the trails',"bike, hike and run with trees'","hike,run,bicycle,ski,camp,swim'",,I donate money to preserve the land so I can enjoy it and my children can enjoy it.',yes,,buildings',peolpes idea of what is important. Education',nature',no',recreation',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,occasionally',regularly',Elk Pass area',"X C Skiing, canoeing'",Kananaskis River',Cougars',Kananaskis valley',Nakiska hills',summer hiking and seeing goats',"camping, learn about nature, experience trails while walking'","hike,bicycle,ski,camp,swim,picnic,site-see'",taking my blind and special needs friends for walks and X C skiing',"Preserve it more. Stop further development of urban like amenities such as hotels, stop development of additional roads. Have more public education about the natural environment. Less RV camping allowed and more tent camping allowed.",yes,Legal status of Kan Country as Natural Area and not rec area to develop.',Off road motorized vehicles or motor boats. No more hotels or restaurants or development like that',Kan Country needs more nature conservation and preservation legal status.',nature',no',environment',Legal status of Kan Country and surrounding area that is not native reserve as a protected natural area so that there is not any further development.',"Legal protection of the rivers and their watersheds. Serious fines and jail time for abusers and polluters. Access points developed for the public to access the river to use it, and outhouses at the access points, but the rest of the shoreline to be protected from access to reduce erosion. This includes for cattle--there should be water pumped to hold troughs to reduce damage to the shorelines.'","More public info on the natural areas, how the public can protect them while in the park and what they can do as a volunteer or donator to protect the area and nature in it while not in the park.'","There should not be any motorized vehicles or boats in the area. The noise is damaging to wildlife. If overuse is damaging any area, it should be restricted use and numbers like in National Parks. Outfitters should have environmental rules to follow and they should pay for and create things to reduce impact such as outhouses that can be emptied at their expense.'",No But pooping in remote areas needs to be dealt with. Need remote outhouses that are emptied. Need Leave No Trace Public Ed program on how to pack out own human waste.',I am concerned about industrial development and urban and human encrouchment.',"They should have a say and be at the table for all planning and long term planning along with Environmentalists, municipalities etc.'",Very Important',I do not know if it is. I depend on environmental groups to tell me if it is not.',Only in relation to damage to shorelines to get water. Water should be pumped to troughs so cattle stay away from the shorelines.',We need to know more about its ecology and the accumulative effects and impacts of the Bow Valley corridor developments on the natural area in the area.',It should be restricted in the entire area. Hunting should be a sport that is banned in Alberta.',Less access for large groups and commericial operators. Large groups should stay elsewhere and visit the area in small groups.',Yes.',yes,,The natural areas are most interesting. Water is important and will become more so in the future and everything possible should be done to protect it and conserve it and its watersheds in the area. Wrong? Lack of legal protected status.'
 yes, yes, frequent, frequent, there are so many...I'll go with the Mount Indefatigable Trail / scramble - south summit (for now)," hiking, scrambling, photography, skiing and snowshoeing, basking in the beautiful surroundings, etc."," Along the Elbow River, just east of Canyon Creek where the Elbow has sculpted a wonderous canyon", any and all!," trees, mountains, wildlife, spectacular view points, and crystal clear water"," Cut blocks (old and new), sour gas well sites, and most of McLean Creek OHV areas", Swimming in the Elbow with my kids at Paddy's Flat on a +30 degree day...," Have a say, and be heard!!! --> whether or not industrial activities are permitted to proceed"," hike,bicycle,ski,climb,camp,swim,picnic,site-see,fish", Find some peace and commune with Mother Nature," Buy out SLS's FMA (and any other industrial license I could afford), and then lobby the government to create a park...", no, Government action to protect Northeastern Kananaskis," Cut blocks, sour gas wells, ATVs, dirt bikes, etc.", Theopen for business' attitude toward K-Country! Leave it alone!!!, nature, no, environment," Do NOT allow any industrial/polluting/destructive activities (logging, sour gas development, OHV usage, etc.)"," Protect the areas which require protection from logging, sour gas development, and OHV use.",, See below...inComments'...," No, the fewer the human-madefacilities' the more people will enjoy nature for what it truly is...", ABSOLUTELY!!! This has been a concern for my family and I since we moved to Alberta seven years ago., I'm not sure...," It's everything!!! The only reason about 500,000 Calgarians visit Eastern K-Country (Elbow Valley) is BECAUSE of the visual appeal - I doubt very much that these Calgarians flock to see the newest cut block on their weekend camping trips...", Yes and no. Areas which are protected from logging are truly the places which are most appealing. Spray Lakes Sawmill's FMA for Northeastern Kananaskis is so flawed and illogical that it tarnishes any credibility that the government has earned to protect and conserve the other areas of K-Country...," I think that watersheds are being compromised because of cattle (as well, the trees which are killed when their bark is stripped). Then, of course, there's the amount of manure one stumbles over/through on many of the trails. That, too, is disconcerting...I don't really see any benefit at all! What's wrong with all the rangeland to the east of K-Country (away from the forests)? Seems like there's alot more grass to eat out there..."," Bragg Creek derives most of it's moderate success from it's tourism economy. Calgarians can access the Elbow Valley quickly, and enjoy the verdant (for now) forests of eastern Kananaskis. If industry is allowed to strip away trees, and views, no one will want to visit, and Bragg Creek's economy will wither...Habitat for wildlife is also being compromised by industrial activity, and bears, cougars, etc. are moving east into the Bragg Creek area where they can find suitably undisturbed tracks of forest..."," It's a very good thing! I can't understand how one cancommune' with Nature, then take a shot with a high-powered rifle at the wildlife most people wish to simply admire..."," Firstly, I believe that Sustainable Resource Development should concentrate on sustaining the oil sands - that's where they are needed most. In terms of allowing any and all resource extraction in Kananaskis to occur because of SRD decision-making, definitely would necessitate a drastic change - for instance, since most peoplethink' that all of Kananaskis is a PARK, a ministry more suited to environmental protection would be in order...Also a park should be created in the Northeastern jurisdiction of K-Country which gets the most visitors, and has, unfortunately, the most industrial activities.",," Yes. So long as it's not, for example, theFirst Sour Gas Well' on Moose Mtn., etc."," No new facilities are needed. But a program about the benefits of intact, contiguous forests is desperately needed. A Ministry of Environment should be one which espouses conservation and protection of wild places. All I've ever heard from the government is how forests should bemanaged' (for profit-sake, one may surmise)...", What's WRONG
 yes, yes, regularly, occasionally, many, hiking/horsebackriding/ cross country skiing," little elbow, west Bragg", bear/moose," forests, views", logged areas, horseback riding trip/canoeing, there is wverithing I want," hike,run,bicycle,ski,horseback", ," I would do a campaign to educate people about what it's happening around them, what they have, what they are losing.", yes," Information, education, more control of the public areas, trails,", gas/ logging/atv and off roads vehicles/, It will fix itself if we let it go...no more interference, nature, no," environment,realestate"," Respect, preserve it. There should be more restrictions as for activities that can be carried out in the area.", Kananaskis offers the opportunity to organize any kind of activity that respects the natural environment. We need to protect this resorceful area. An information system for the public should be improved. Information tours should be held (See for example Sandie Cross Conservation for sample of activities). These activities could create a revenue for thepark'.,," Considering the growing population in the Calgary area, Kananaskis should be a park with some well regulated activities that can be carried out. More control of the public areas, more information to the public in order to create a safe environment for people and nature", The recreation facilities are limited and not large enough to satisfy the overgrowing request of the tourism using the area, The impact on nature really worries me., No idea but they could be involved in a conservancy project.," It is important. People who uses the area wants to hike, sky or do what they want in a natural environment otherwise they would spend their free time in a park downtown. Visual matters to the soul.", The forest has been exploited. Many logged areas haven't been reforested., as there are areas for off roads driving there should be areas for grazing," Agriculture and industrial activities should be restricted. tourism should be more controlled and people should be more educated about the ecology of the area (eg interpretative trails, educational events)", It's good. There also should be more control of the hunting activities also in the designated areas.," Public parking should be improved, Public areas should be improved and extended. This would limit the damage to the adjacent forest and meadows.Too many people uses the area and the structure aren't sufficient. On weekends it's impossible to find a picnic table....",, Yes we should. They are part of us and our heritage," More parking areas, more picnic areas. More educating programs. We need to make people more aware and responsible"," K-Country offers the opportunity for different kind of activities because of the different kind of landscape. There is something for everybody. It's easy accessible, near Calgary. It's quite unique with its forests, lakes, trails, roads, wildlife Exploitation it's what is wrong. Not enough regulation and lots of people take advantage of it (eg garbage, fires etc)"
yes,yes,regularly',regularly',all',mountain biking/camping',,bears',upper and lower lakes',logging',camping with the family',hike and bike',"hike,run,bicycle,ski,climb,skate,camp,picnic,fish'",,Preserve the park in it's most natural state and improve maintenance on the trails.',yes,,Logging and oil and gas',,nature',no',"environment,recreation'",Reduce resource developement.',,Races - mtn bike and running',,,Yes.',,Very Important.',,,,Good.',,,,,
 yes, yes, frequent, regularly, nihahi, hike, elbow river, lynx, mountains, clear-cut, Banded Peak Challenge, swim," hike,bicycle,ski,skate,camp,swim,picnic,site-see,horseback", scavenger hunt, Buy-out Spray Lakes, yes, a pristine environment, clear-cuts,"The multi-use policy is not working. The contradiction between restricting access for recreation while permitting bulldozers is absurd. Facilities and programs for people (Allen Bill, Ice Cave, trails, signs, ranger station, interpretation) have deteriorated while industrial use accelerates. Transfer sole authority over access to TPRC and consult public to determine who has access to do what.", recreation, yes," environment,tourism", Let nature take its course, Stop logging. Calgary should invest in securing its watershed," Information officers, nature walks, more support for outdoor groups", Kananaskis is for people and wildlife only - no machines," Better trail maintenance, signage, fix bridges, fix Allen Bill Pond, open the ice cave"," Yes, Trails are closed or turned into roads and access due to industrial activity is restricted. Industry and agriculture are contaminating the water supply. People draw spiritual strength from nature - they become dispirited when faced with the destruction of nature.", They could have an interpretive centre," Very important, but unless we have good trails and facilities we can't get there to see the beauty"," No. We need a gardiner not a logger. Replant where forests have been lost, prune where necessary and reduce risk of forest fire by removing fuel and cutting fire breaks", Problem. Cows contaminate and they can be intimidating, Yes. Yes. Yes., Good. Hunters shouldn't be allowed near people. Fishing is OK," Need to observe the impact, but most annual events are OK", Transfer jurisdiction over Kananaskis to Parks. It is absurd that Parks restricts access for the TransRockies and Banded Peak Challenge and SRD allows bulldozers and feller/bunchers to rip up the environment, Absolutely. They are irreplaceable," You should use the ranger station at Allen Bill for conservation officers (hire some). If not, turn it into a hostel"," Kananaskis is too valuable as a nature reserve for a city of 1-million and the visitors who come. It provides jobs and wealth for gateway communities, outdoor retaillers, guides. It adds value to real estate and draws home businesses. It captures carbon and filters water. Erosion from industrial use adds cost to Calgary's filtration"
 yes, yes, regularly, regularly, all trails in the kananaskis are fabulous!," cycling, hiking, x-c skiing", the journey to the top, grizzly bears as long as I dont see them up close., all that is natural," wide corridors, logging, trails eroded and damaged by motorized vehicles", every exhilarating breathtaking vista fills me with happiness...thats fun!, all of the activities below.," hike,bicycle,ski,climb,camp,swim,fish", ," try to reduce wildlife killed in collisions with vehicles, protect forests, limit future elite tourism development (like golf, hotels, downhill skiing), build trails along existing roads, put wide corridors to better use, improve trail signage.",, , industrial and/or commercial logging operations have no place in the Kananaskis, , nature, no," environment,recreation"," Limit development, implement policy for no resource extraction for any commercial or industrial purpose.", make sure upstream human activities are not adding sediment or other substances that will adversely affect water quality," Its great as is, some trails could use a bit better marking.", People should have access to enjoy and appreciate and be active in the area with maximum emphasis on non-motorized activities., I think its pretty much fine as is., What does my safety have to do with industrial activities? I am not in favour of industrial activities and am hugely concerned about their impact.," Primary, as long as this doesnt permit industrial or further commercial development.", Paramount!, Any permits to clearcut log in advance of pine beetles or in pine beetle affected areas is not appropriate forest management. There is plenty of evidence that suggests other successful and far less intrusive methods of managing forests and limiting spread of beetles., Grandfathering existing leases and restricting additional lease areas would likely be good. Monitoring impacts would be good.," I think we know plenty, the problem is that government isnt using the known info well enough in making decisions."," Based on populations, fishing and hunting restrictions should always be applied in favour of any healthy natural resource.", There is no need to increase access for more large groups and commercial operators.," It seems there is conflict between the present Kananaskis administration and the objectives of Sustainable Resource Development Department. I dont think the Minister truly understands the meaning of the word sustainable. This is a problem! If anything, give more jurisdiction to the K. Admin. to protect the park and surrounding areas in perpetuity.", Of course.," I cant think of any, but then as a visitor, I dont really use facilities or programs much.", Its fantastic to have K-Country there. I wish it was bigger and that issues of logging were not even coming up. Its ridiculous to see photographs of what the Department has allowed in terms of clearcutting along the Trans Canada Trail. What are they thinking???
 yes, yes, regularly, occasionally," Elbow Loop, Powderface, Sulpur Springs, Tom Snow"," Mountain Bike, XC Ski"," Three Point Canyon, Little Elbow Pass", All," Trees, Rocks, Mountains, Wildlife"," Forestry Cut Blocks, Oil & Gas developments"," Cycling, Hiking with friends"," Mountain bike, hike, hunt"," hike,bicycle,ski,camp,picnic,site-see,hunt", , , no," nothing, everything is already there", money hungry developers, , nature, no," environment,recreation", Minimal human development. Allowing recreational access for people to see the environment and understand why it must be conserved., Stop all resource development/logging from the head waters and continue to limit it downstream., Just leave it as it is., All public should have free access to the park for recreation purposes only. The multi-use policy may be too easily manipulated as it stands.," The facilities are fine as they are. This is a wild area, the facilities should accommodate the visitor load, but preserve the surroundings."," I have no safety concerns. I am concerned about the impact of agriculture on native species in terms of extirpation, and competition.", to share the lead in understanding and managing this wild area., It is one of the highest. This reflects on the state of health of the area., With the current logging activity I would say it is not managed well.," I see this as a problem. Native species must compete with an introduced species, and others may be forced out.", We need to know more about all of these to be able to see the whole picture of human impact on the Kananaskis.," This has been so for many years, and has been a reasonable way to help manage our wildlife.", It may be that the current norms for this are sufficient. I see no problems as it is now., , Yes., , 
 yes, yes, regularly, regularly, all, mountain biking/camping, , bears, upper and lower lakes, logging, camping with the family, hike and bike," hike,run,bicycle,ski,climb,skate,camp,picnic,fish", , Preserve the park in its most natural state and improve maintenance on the trails., yes, , Logging and oil and gas, , nature, no," environment,recreation", Reduce resource developement., , Races - mtn bike and running, , , Yes., , Very Important., , , , Good., , , , , 
 yes, yes, frequent, regularly, cox hill, cycling, , , the scenery, development (e.g. kananskis village), too many to name just one, the things ive always done," hike,run,bicycle,ski,climb,swim", , put it in trust and use it to maintain a park and maintain the ecosystem for wildlife., yes, protection of the habitat and natural beauty, development, , nature, no," environment,tourism,recreation,film,agriculture", Less development., , Less development.," Somewhat, but I feel that theres too much development being allowed.", No.," Safety, no. Impact of this stuff? Yes.", , Very., No., They seem to cause a lot of damage; is it worth it?, Probably all of these.," Good, although restricting these entirely is a bad idea (unless theres an ecological need).", Probably more if theyre sustainable (i.e. mostly non-destructive)., We should expand all parks; theres not much wilderness left., yes," maybe educational programs. not really anything, though; theres lots of information on the Web already about the area (recreation-wise).", 
 yes, yes, occasionally, infrequently, Moose Mountain, Mountain Biking, Anywhere on a trail, All, Untouched Beauty, Logging Activity, All, Continue to Enjoy," hike,bicycle,ski,climb,picnic,site-see", , But it and keep logging out, yes, , , , all, no, environment, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Jumping pound/Cox Moose mountain,MTB and Hike,powderface ridge,crow,scenery,iron creek,summit on Moose mountain,show my grandkids in 50 years the beauty of K country,bicycle,camp/ hike,More campgrounds reopen Fortress Mtn.,no,provicial park,logging,communication between the people and,recreation,no,environment,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,occasionally,occasionally,Nihahi Ridge,Walking,Banded Peak,All,Wild flowers,Industrial disturbance,Biking and hiking up Banded Peak,"Walking, hiking, biking",ski,,"Set winter ski trails, repair oil and lumber damage.",no,Regard for the landscape,Industry,The landscape needs to be protected and restored.,nature,no,environment,Keep motorized vehicles out.,No industry such as logging or cattle-pasturing,Keep industrial development out.,Anyone who takes only pictures and leaves only footprints should have access. The multi-use policy is not working.,We need to conserve and repair what we have.,I am concerned about industrial/agricultural activities.,The same role as any Canadian citizen or respectful visitor to the area.,Very.,No.,Not sure.,,Good.,,,Yes.,,Scenic beauty is its greatest asset. Development (industrial) is wrong.
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,Moose packers,Mountain biking,Moose Mountain,Moose,The whole place itself is mostly beautful.,"The Giant New roads for logging, oil & gas",Every single bike ride.,Keep riding my bike.,bicycle,Photography,Protent as much land as possible. Assist in a campaign to raise awareness of not only what logging does to the environment but the fact that everyone here complaning about it probably built a new house in the least year.,yes,"Not much is missing now, but it will be sad when some trails are un-passable.",It would be nice if industries that use the area would leave less of a footprint,"I don't know if there is a solution, we need lumber, oil & gas... right? it comes from somewhere",all,no,recreation,"Understanding, and forcing industry to leave as little footprint as possible.","Understanding, and forcing industry to leave as little footprint as possible.",Keeping it as natural as possible would be nice.,"It works for me, the casual users could always have more awareness of sharing the trail.",All I need is trails.,"Both, the affect of human need or resources is quite shocking when it slaps you in the face when your on a trail ride. sucks even more when you come around a corner and hit a pile of trees. hence safety concers.",Being a voice.,Very,I don't have enough info to answer this.,I don't see it as a problem. We like beef. it has to come from somewhere.,Yes.,Good,Less for any sort of commercial things.,I don't have enough info to answer this.,Yes,I don't have enough info to answer this.,Its a really great place for recreation with unbeatable access from a major city. It is a bit missleading as people assume it protected land and are quite surprised when this sort of thing happens. I understand that lumber has to come from somewhere. but I think it could be done a lot more effecticly and possibly not destroy major recreation areas. A LOT of people visit these areas year round. The goverment has really messed this one up.
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,baldy pass,mountain biking,barrier lake,trees,trees and terrain,the impact of humans,freeriding at moose mountain,bike and snowboard,"bicycle, ski",,"I would buy the property rights of the land, or bribe whoever is responsible for the logging.",yes,nothing,logging,,nature,no,"environment, recreation",Leave it alone.,Leave it alone.,Leave me alone.,"- Everyone who's willing to pay to use it. - no, multi-use policy is not working.",No,yes,Not sure. I don't know there property rights to the land.,very important.,I would have never answered this survey if I thought it was managed well.,As long as they pay a fee to use the land. The fee should be equal to the marginal social (environmental) damage they cause to the land.,"Yes, property rights.",Good.,"It depends how much they are willing to pay access the land, and if this amount offsets the danmage they cause to the environment.",Sure. How about transferable property rights that are auctioned?,yes.,Nothing new is needed.,"Everything is interesting about K-country. It makes living in Calgary tolerable. Without it, I would leave. There is nothing wrong with K-country. Everything is wrong with the people who manage k-country."
yes,yes,frequent,infrequently,Race of Spades,Mountain Biking,Moose Mountain,birds,access from calgary,lack of communication between all user groups,biking,Ride more trails,bicycle,,trail development and open forum for differnet user groups to build sustainable trails and work together for the collective of all not each individual group,yes,Lack of approved trails for riding,,"lack of communication, hold forums and encourage groups to work together",all,no,recreation,"enusre proper shelter and food supplies, make sure that you look at the big picture and consider natural cycles in nature that occur over 100's or 1000's of years",Ensure that activty around these areas does not lead to contamination of water,Organized trail bulidng maintenance days. events such as the Calgary cycle enudro downhill this year,I think all groups should have access and work together,"No, the facilities are good, maybe more trails",Not concerned about my safety. I have concerns that the industrial activities are not being performed in a sustainable and proper fashion. I think they may be more knee jerk or short term fixes rather than long term,Not sure?,"Very, it is a great area to enjoy and have access to. If it starts to look more commercialized it will become like areas up aroudn Hinton where logging and oil use give the area a feel of industrial rather than natural","Not sure. I don't think clear cutting is the way to go. Naturally forests go through stages of death, but the falling of trees provides nutrients through decay back to the soils and allows for primary, secondary and tertiary flora and fauna development","Not a problemm, it slows vehichle traffic down because of the hazard of them being on the road",Yes,Good,More access as long as they are properly planned and apporved,,Yes,,"I think to biggest problem is to many user groups and they are all on different pages. There needs to be more communication between groups and an effort to give the best for all groups, which will require some sacrifices for all parties to make sure it fair for all"
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,smith dorian trail areas,"hiking, snowshoeing, x-country skiing",all along the smith dorian area,"grizzly, voles, elk, mountain sheep, goats, chipmunks, birds,","the untouched areas, the snow in winter, and the migration of birds in the spring and fall","clear cutting of the trees, destroying the beauty which is kananaskis","every time I am there I have fun, can't say which is the MOST",I like it the way it is,ski,snow shoe,pay off the logging companies so that they leave it alone.,yes,,,,nature,no,recreation,"don't increase the trail, or camp grounds. leave the human impact minimal",,leave it alone,,no,yes,it isn't there park. they have there land and have put up a casino. they should not be invovled with the park,duh!!!,not entirely,yes,"ecology,",n/a,no,increase the park,yes,no,
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,mount baldy,hiking,anywhere!,moose,the mountains,the commercialism,Climbing Mount Yamnuska with friends,enjoy the wilderness without worry of it disapearing,"hike, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, picnic, study",,buy more land to expand the park and support the existing information locations to avoid closing.,yes,protection for the land,"billboards, logging",to fix the problems we need conservation and preservation,nature,no,recreation,stop capitalizing on the land.,enforce safe practices of returning water from our sewage system and industries.,guides and information,the general public should have access to recreate and enjoy nature.,no,definitely,"the same as everyone else, to enjoy and protect the land.",very.,no.,I see it as being neutral,informing us as much as possible would be advantageous.,good,less,"yes, the park should be expanded.",yes,programs that educate the public about the area and why it should be protected.,"It is in the middle of one of the most beautiful places on earth, but it has been taken advantage of for profit."
,,select,select,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"I just spent 30 minutes filling out this form and when I typed in the captcha and pushed submit, it came back and said i was wrong and that was that. I don't have time to re-do this whole thing and I don't know where it went! HELP!!! Now what???"
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,,"cross-country skiing, biking, hiking",,bears,the undeveloped areas,the developed/logged areas,numerous hiking and camping trips,,"hike, bicycle, camp",,,yes,,resource development and commercialism shouldn't be there,,recreation,no,oil&gas,Manage the ecosystem with a big picture perspective,Manage the Elbow and Bow watersheds upstream of Calgary to ensure quality and quantity.,,"No, I would suggest we have too much resource development in Alberta and not enough park space. It seems that resource development always beats out the environment in this province. I think that needs to be examined and chanaged.",I think the facilities in Kananaskis are fine.,I am concerned with industrial activities in K-Country.,not sure.,Extremely important,Apparently not if they are clear-cut logging areas of kananaskis.,No sure.,,I think this is good.,I think there should be less access for large groups adn commercial operators.,,yes,,
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Moose Mountain,Mountain biking,Moose Mountain,Black Bears,The Summer Mountains,Logging Clearcut,Riding with friends,Anything I Want to,"bicycle, OHV",,"Build More and Better trails for everyone, and manitaiin the existing ones",no,,,,all,no,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,too many to mention,hiking and xc skiing,many,moose,being alone in the wilderness,"clearcuts, hotels",getting lost on a mountain bike,Use it until I'm 100.,"hike, bicycle, ski, skate, camp, picnic, site-see",refresh my soul,Expand park boundaries to exclude logging / grazing /resource activities.,yes,More conservation officers to secure / control existing use.,Mixed usage activities and hotels.,Deterioration of existing facilities. ATV useage,nature,yes,oil&gas,Leave the land as natural and relatively undeveloped as possible,Leave the land as natural and relatively undeveloped as possible,Re-opened shut down information buildings. Also need more signage or replace existing signage which is old.,The mutli-use policy does not work. Remove resource extraction especially logging. Severly restrict ATV and grazing use and somewhat restrict equistrain use as it makes a degrades trails and riparian ares.,More camping and more supervsion of these sites. Also more school sites for outreach camps / daysites for school children. We need less special interest camps.,I am concerned about my safety when ATV's are around and also during hunting season. I am not in favour of ag or industrial use as it degrades the critical habitat of the eastern slopes.,I don't want to see them get special hunting and logging provisions to use this area and exploit the resources just because they are of native heritage.,High importance to refresh my own soul and be proud of what my province has done.,Not at all. Mutli-use activities just doesn't work as a model anymore in this rapidly growing province.,"Depends on where they graze them. They pollute waters in riparian ares, damage trails and riparian areas. However they may be of some benefit to graze historical ungulate areas, but that would be better served to bring back native ungulates.",,"I belive this is good, especially where species numbers are dwindling. Also the hunting season means I cannot use this area in the fall for my own safety.","I am not in favour of the high impact uses such as hotels, golf courses, etc.","I would like to see the whole desigantedKananaskis' area under parks and not SRD whose mandate is resource extraction, logging and cattle.","Depends on what it is,...but generally yes.",I would like to see all the Kananaskis be handled more like a National Park. Quebec has a tremendous provincial park program that we should be looking at.,
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,baldy pass,moutain biking,kananaskis country best place in the world,elk,how you feel like your in the middle of nowwhere so close to a city,all the logging that is going on.,Riding my mtn bike,moutain bike hike not see logging.,"hike, bicycle, ski, climb, site-see",,create trails so that everybody can enjoy.,no,nothing it is awsome the way it is.,logging trucks,the trails just need some matience to fix weather related problems.,recreation,no,"environment, recreation",to protect that land to keep it the way it has been for hundreds of years.,keep the commerical impact to the river up stream of calgary to a minimal.,haveing races or events in areas hat dont hurt the wellbeing of the area.,The multi use is working very well with just a little maintence the trails can last forever.,We dont need new as much as make the ones we have better.,Im concerened that once we log a bit here and there that eventually it will all be logged and then why would anybody come to alberta.,None,Very important as long as we can use it.,its alrite right now but could be mantained a bit better .,No thats fine they dont bother us and we dont bother them.,,That is good to perserve wildlife.,I think that there should be more access aloud but having strict guide lines.,The boundaries of the park need to be increased to enclose all of the luciouse forest we have.,,New trail maintaince progreams are needed.,
yes,yes,regularly,infrequently,all of them,mountain biking,moose mountain,,sunsets,clear cut areas,a day of riding,ride more and be involved in new trail construction,bicycle,,make it so no one could log there,yes,more trails,logging,the existing trails should be expanded and deemed off limits for logging companies,recreation,no,"environment, recreation",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
no,yes,infrequently,infrequently,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,infrequently,never,,,,,,,,,bicycle,,,yes,,,,recreation,no,"environment, recreation",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,regularly,occasionally,Race of Spades,Mountain Biking,Moose Mountain,Conifers,The scenic location and leisure associated with.,"Deforestration, pollution",Riding the trails,Keep on enjoying its playground for many more years to come,"hike, bicycle, camp, site-see",,,,Nothing,Excessive logging,"Trails can use some maintence, but volunteer groups can manage to patch them up",nature,no,recreation,"Promote mandatory, yet reasonable rules in the area.",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,What's interesting is the ability to use the spectacular location to one's leisure and enjoyment free of charge. Excessive extraction of its natural resources and development around the area distracts the natural essence and beauty of the area and its biology.
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,Telephone Loop,Mountain Biking,Kananaskis,Moose,The scenery,cutblocks,Hiking with my daughters,"biking, hiking, cross country skiing, camping","hike, run, bicycle, OHV, ski, climb, skate, camp",,Make a park and leave it as is.,yes,,"Oil and gas wells, logging",Stop approving more logging and new gas wells,nature,no,environment,"Minimize major land changes such as new roads, diverting water ways. Leave the trees and stream in place.",Minimize cattle operations upstream. Cattle waste is the number one casue of water contamination in the Elbow river.,The trails seem to provide the right balance between allowing people to enjoy the area via activities but with minmal impact to the animals and plants in the area.,The area belongs to the people and the animals. I doubt the aniamls agree that the multiuse policy encompassing gas wells and logging is correct.,Not really. The facilities in place are already top notch.,These activities do not affect humans saftey in the area.,They seem to be content not changing the landscape by much as long as their government checks keep coming in.,Very Important.,"Again, I think the logging operations are not being managed properly.",It is the number one cause of contamination in water.,I think there have been enough studies. It is time to do something.,Good.,The system is good the way it is.,More of K-country needs to be designated as park.,Yes,,K-country is one of the best multi-use recreational ares in Canada. We must protect it. Please be careful with the major human impact projects like logging and oil and gas.
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Powderface Ridge,Mountain Biking,Kan Lakes,Moose,Treed Mountains,Clear-cut due to logging,Skiing Backcountry,"Hike, ski, bike, canoe, unwind","hike, bicycle, ski, picnic, fish",canoe,Preserve as is and remove the cows,yes,Nothing,Logging and ATV's,Management should stop trying to cater to resource industry and motorized recreation,nature,no,environment,Monitor use and adjust management plans,Same as above,,"No, can't please everyone, need to made some hard decisions and phase out cattle, logging, oil and gas",No,Yes. Logging is making trails exposed and hurting the entire ecosystem. Cattle are dangerous when using the trails and don't below here.,,Very.,No. Too much clear-cut logging.,This is completely unacceptable to me.,,"Yes, need to restrict hunting more.",,,Yes.,,
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,Moose Mountain Lookout,Mountain Biking,Paddys Flats,Deer,The forest,The ATV designated areas,Everytime I go mountain biking is the best time,Not worry about the forest getting chopped dow,"hike, bicycle, ski, swim, picnic, study",,I would use the money to provide grassroots organizations the ability to create and maintain sanctioned trails in an effort to reduce the impact of people who create trails with no concern for wildlife. I would also stop all the excessive logging,no,Areas where we don't always have to worry about logging,Loggers,The way the provincial government looks at this wonderful multi use area as primarily industrial,nature,no,recreation,Set up specific land use areas limiting the ability of industry to lay waste to pristine wildlife.,"Reduce soil run off by reducing logging, do not allow for our drinking water to be used by industry.",,"The policy is not working as logging becomes more intensified. Everyone should have access, but you should not be allowed to profit of the physical resources.",,Often I have worried about being on a trail where logging is taking place nearby. You can never tell when you will stumble across an area being chopped down.,,It is the first forest you come across as you leave Calgary on the trans canada highway and as such it serves as a vibrant link to the foothills. It is very important,"No, it is being sold out to loggers","A benefit, animals need a place to graze. It makes sense to do it in an area where they won't be negatively affecting the land","Agriculture, industry and ecology",Good,,,,,K-Country is interesting because it is a forest system that serves as peaceful solitude. The only thing that's wrong with it is how it's being logged
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,Burstell,Skiing,Burstell Pass,Moose,Trees,buildings,Skiing,Anyting outdoors related and enjoy the wild area,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp, picnic",,create protected parkland,yes,good management,"Building, logging, gas, any development of any type",Poor government,nature,no,"environment, recreation",To leave the area in it's natural environment with little industrial impact,Limit industrial impact. Create a green space around the waters.,Recognize the land as endangered land and make it into a national park.,The public in general with no industrial or retail assult,No,Very much,They should provide valuable input and help to manage the land.,"Very - one of the most as if visual appealing, then theoretically there should be no problems such as logging or other industrial acts ruining the land",I guess not since there is much industrial acts happening that are not preserving the land.,"Both good and bad. They need the natural resources, but at the same time they use up and pollute the natural resources.","I don't think so. It is not like the gov't doesn't know, they do. But they think economy is the most important thing, and won't stop to think twice about it.","Good - we can't have all of our resources depleated, plus the safety of being able to hike/bike without being shot at is a nice plus.",Less access.,increase the boundaries of parks and improve the land use management to reduce industry impact.,Yes,Better education about parks and problems they are faced with.,Because it is so close to Calgary it is in trouble from money makers. It is really sad that the govt tries to fool the public to better their economic and politcal gain and destroy the land.
yes,yes,occasionally,infrequently,"most of them, no particular favourites","mountain biking, backpacking",,its all very beautiful,the remote rugged scenic country,logging,I would have to say the greatest backpacking trip last fall.,participate in the many outdoor activities without the thought of this stupid logging.,"hike, bicycle, OHV, ski",,plant trees wherever logging has destroyed precious ecosystems.,yes,maybe better trail networks for self propelled outdoor activities,logging,"maybe do selective logging, or restrict the companies",recreation,no,"environment, tourism, recreation",,RESTRICT horseback riders from letting they're animals deficating or urinating atleast 150m from any bodies of water. ENSURE that any companies near any bodies of water aren't polluting it in any way. We are inhabitants of this planet and we MUST take care of it for now and the future,"I'm a freeride/downhill mounain biker, some trails would be great","I believe dirtbikes and ATV's MUST have the latest epa compiant spark arresters, it is proven they work. I also believe they must also stay on marked trail. TREAD LIGHTLY",,,,,"maybe not quite, I think that logging should be restricted somewhat more","as long as it's controlled, and the animals aren't deficating or urinaing close to bodies of water then I think its fine.",,I think its a good thing because some areas are much more delicate of an ecosystem than other areas. Hunting and fishing are great outdoor activities. But they must be managed,,,,,MAKE IT A PARK! Its been too long.
no,yes,regularly,regularly,"lusk, baldy and network from sibbald to wasootch creek","climbing, hiking and mountain biking",barrier lake area,various migratory birds,overall scenery,haven't experienced anything I believe to be particularly ugly,"climbing, hiking and skiing",the things I can do now,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, picnic, site-see, fish",,"Continued improvement on existing trails, education for the public on the true value of multiple use forests. Improvements on land use planning frameworks to ensure overlapping users have better integration into one anothers plans and operations",yes,nothing,futher permanent developments like Kananaskis village,"very little, maintain status quo, invest in sustainable land use development",all,yes,logging,"leave it to nature, including elimination of human intervention for natural disaster (fire, flood etc). Loaded question and answer as man has been interfering for 100+ years already",Continued research into the effects of industrial affects on the landscape. Ensure industrial continue to follow current best known practices in operational activities,Leave it as is.,"The multi use policy is working but can use vast improvements towards true integration of activities between industries, i.e centralised planning","No, adding more rec facilities means more development on a permanent basis",No,Traditional users of the landscape,"Very important,",Yes it is,Can be a problem as cattle have negative impacts on watercourses and tend to over browse certain areas and neglect others,We need to know more about all aspects as they all have impacts that each blames on the other,Restrictions are good to ensure there isn't an overharvest of wildlife. This should not necessarily extend to complete elimination of hunting in the area.,Less as the impacts from one time large events can be devastating,"No, it is time to educate people on the current boundaries and uses so there will be more cooperation on how to benefit all users in a way that impacts the environment the least.",Yes,,The history of development in the area and the lack of understanding people have regarding use over the last 100 years as well as the lack of understanding by the public as to what/where the Kananaskis is. Many people do not realize that the Kananaskis is not a huge provincial park where industrial activity exists.
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,ace of spades,mountian biking,bragg creek,cougar,everything,industry,mountian bikeing down moose mountian,mountian biking,bicycle,,create a natural area with out logging or oil activity,yes,,"industry, atvs",,nature,no,environment,Make a recreational / natural area that people value and are willing to protect,protect the eastern slopes,more trails,All non motorized vehicles / people should be allowed,no,I am concerned about the impact of industry in Kananaskis,,very,,benefit,,fishing and hunting both have a place in Kananaskis,,,yes,,
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,West Bragg / Station Flats area,1) Mountain Biking 2) Hiking,,,Mountains with Trees!,Clearcuts!,1)Mountain Biking various trails 2) Paragliding,Continue to enjoy my chosen activities in a minimally disturbed setting.,"hike, bicycle, ski, climb",Paragliding,Mainatin/rebuild selected trails & build new ones for different user groups.,yes,,1) Clearcut logging and associated mess! 2) Cattle grazing,STOP clearcut logging,recreation,no,"environment, recreation",Insure larger scale human activities like logging are severly curtailed.,,Keeping K-Country as natural as possible would be a really good start. I have no desire to visit and hike/ride through fields of stumps! One of my favorite mtn bike loops WAS Quirk Creek Wildhorse loop. Then a few years ago logging wiped out significant portions. YUCK.,"VERY LIMITED or selective Oil & Gas activity may be permissible ONLY in previously disturbed areas. No new clear cuts should be allowed, only a selective logging approach should be considered for such threats as pine beatles, or to minimize fire dangers.",The facilities we have are good. I think there could be some room for additional trail development,"This is a world class recreation area close to a major urban center, to allow significant industrial activity here would be a grave mistake. This is a gem, let's keep it that way.",,"Critical. I enjoy my time in the wilderness to escape the city. I am quite sure those K Country posters showing flowers, mtns, wildlife etc.. would not be outsold by new posters showing grazing cattle and clearcuts with streams full of mud.","Until recently it appeared yes; however, the most recent plans and activity areover the Top' and should be stopped. If the goverment has to compensate the forestry industry or Oil and Gas Co's for stopping their activities here then as a taxpayer I would support that.",PROBLEM. I am tired of riding & hiking through cow pies and having the trails chewed up by cattle. I am also unaware of the compenstaion the crown receives to allow this activity. I bet it is minimal compared to the mess and environmental issues & stress it causes. I would be curious to know the compensation.,I suspect we already know what we need. The area needs to be isolated from industrial and agricultural activity!!!,"Continued restriction is warranted. There are many areas where these activities are not restricted, hunters and fisherman can go there.","I think that the current balance for large groups and commercial operators is quite good. If however, continued or larger scale logging, agricultural or Oil and Gas activity is allowed, then in comparison, what could possibly be the harm in allowing larger groups of people into the same areas. But of course why would larger groups or commercial operators want with a dirty moonscape.",Consider extending Peter Lougheed park to cover all of Kananaskis. Its time!,Yes.,,GOOD: The fantastic scenery and recreational opportunities in a wilderness setting. BAD: Grazing cattle and clearcut logging. There is nothing appealing about these.
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,Powderface,Mountain biking,Top of Mount Baldy,Birds,Fresh Air,"Cutlines, Clearcuts,Logging,Gas Pipelines",Bow 80 Mountainbike Race,"Not see constant activity from Oil & Gas, Logging",bicycle,,Make it a Protected Park. Educate people on how sensitive an area it is. Save beautiful areas that are still intact and have not been touched by industry. Sit down and create a framework for sustaining the area for the long term.,yes,Trail maintenance,Industry,Don't let industry make their own rules here,nature,no,environment,"Let mother nature decide their fate, not chainsaws and other tools of industry.",Protect the areas where these rivers flow through.,More events.,"No industry, make this a pure recreation area.",Yes. Huts and info centers. Better signage. Help educate people while they are out on the trails.,I'm very concerned about the level of impact of industry in K Country.,They should have a signifcant voice in the direction of policies that are critical to the health of Kananaskis.,"Very important, tourists and locals in general can see the impact of industry.",Spray Lakes has been given the keys to Kananaskis and they are continuing the industrial legacy that Alberta should be ashamed of. Forget pointing the finger at the deforestation of the Amazon etc.....look at what we are doing here!,As long as the impact of raching is minimal then I'm ok with that. I'd rather see a few cows out there than logging trucks.,Absolutely.,Fishing is ok but no hunting should be allowed.,What a contradiction. Bike races (The Bow 80) and other events are limited but industry is allowed to do more harm than a few bikers will.,Yes. Open and transparent dialogue between all interested parties.,Yes.,Info/Education center with summer and winter programs.,It's so close to the city but is a true wilderness area. It is not a park but a playground for industry.
yes,yes,frequent,frequent,Baldy pass,hiking,k country,,Pristine scenery. Lack of development.,Development,"Mt. Biking, hiking, snow shoeing, photography",I can do all I want now.,"hike, run, bicycle, OHV, ski, climb, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, horseback, hunt, fish, study, work",,Make a park with very limited delopment.,yes,People ! But that's a good thing.,Logging.,"Nothing, it's perfect.",nature,no,"environment, tourism, recreation, retail, guiding, film, realestate, logging, agriculture, oil&gas",Make it into a park.,Absolutely NO to logging anywhere near there.,Leave it alone.,Everyone,No.,"Yes, like logging trucks on any of those roads including the Smith Dorrien.",Not sure.,Very !,Not sure.,Problem escpecially on bike trails.,Yes !,Very good. There should be NO hunting at all.,It's fine.,Yes.,Absolutely ! What a dumb question !,Maybe better info center.,I oove K -Country for it's beauty. I hate going into the parks knowing how bizzy it is with uneducated tourists. My photography of the area speaks loudly of how much time I spend there.
yes,yes,occasionally,occasionally,unknown,"hiking, photography, swimming, picnicing, canoeing",all of K-Counrty,"birds, flowers, trees and animals that inhabit the rocky mountain area","the natural wildlife and growth of living plants, animals & trees",human intervention with heavy mqchinery,"walking, hiking, picnicing driving and seeing the increduble views",all of the above,"hike, run, bicycle, climb, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, horseback, study",,I would begin with restoring the areas damaged by the logging roads and deforested areas with indigenous tree species. Removal of ashfalt roadways in endangered areas to stimulate the wildlife to reinhabit. I think that the finances are best used preserva,yes,,"heavy machinery, logging equipement and oil/gas industry equipement",,nature,no,"environment, tourism, recreation, film",By keeping an alternating rotation of open and retricted areas to human access thereby allowing the regeneration of the environment.,"Keeping litter and garbage and livestock out of areas directly in contact with this water supply. Also, using natural filtration(plants & earth) in conjunction with human-made filtration systems & low usage appliances/toilets etc.","More information, more guided tours and preservation techniques made accessible to the public.",,,"Very concerned about the the eventual impact of industrial/agricultural activities in terms of increased toxicity to the water, land and air in the surrounding rural environments.","Support, knowledge, employment and preservation.",Extremely important!,Uncertain.,There should be restictions for the number of livestock that an individual or group of ranchers is allowed to restict the amount of damage done to this natural habibtat.,More information as to how the impact of all elements affects the long term life of this area.,Restrictions benefit both the animals and the humans in the long run for the preservation of all resources.,Less access for both large groups and commercial operators.,,Absolutely!,See all the above ideas and suggestions.,"For me the interesting aspects of K-Country are that its close enough to a major urban centre that many are able to access it, its gorgeous and unique landscape, the solitude and beauty, that hopefully it will endure another millennium if we as humans help to ensure its preservation. Which is what is wrong with it, precisely that human greed has allowed deterioration and destruction through logging, agriculture and mining that is happening now."
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,Telephone Loop,trail running,Kananaskis,black bears,the mountains,garbage,snow shoeing,"run, hike, bike, ski, snow shoe",run,"hike, run, bike, ski, snowshoe, camp",,no,,,,recreation,no,recreation,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"the mountains, the peacefulness, the animals, the clean water"
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,Elbow Loop,Mountain Biking,Banded Peak,Cougars,The Bio Diversity,"roads, logging",Forget Me Not loop,Mountain Bike every where,"hike, run, bicycle, camp, horseback, work",,"Protected Park, Maintained Trails, Enclosed Areas foe ATVs",yes,Nothing..leave it alone,cattle on the trails...the damage they do,Protect the bio diversity,nature,no,"environment, recreation",Bio Sphere and Land Management,Protect the water sheds and keep activity away from those proetcted areas. That includes logging as forests aid the water quality,Keep it open and free for use,i believe so.,"no, keep it real not manufactired",I am concnerned about poor agriculture practices near the water shed,Custodiansd as much as anyone else,Its beautiful,"No, systematic logging is not a good sign of a heralthy forest. Perhaps use Horse Logging to maintian and preserve the trails",Problem: water shed protection and the damage they do to the wet trails is terrible,"Ecology, Eco Biospheres",Good,less access to commercialisation,Yes.,Yes,"Eco Tours, back country tours",Its beuaty and locality
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,"powderface ridge, moose mountain trail system",mountain biking,moose mountain,all wildlife is good wildlife,wildlife and their ecosystems,logging & gas plants,mountain biking every weekend with friends of all abilities (usually 6 in the group),more mountain biking and trails,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, study",,"reopen Fortress Mountain as a summer resort for lift-accessed mountain biking/hiking. the overhead would be significantly less than during the winter (no facility heating, no snow/slope/avalanche control, less employees, less lifts required to run)",no,Fortress Mountain as a summer resort for lift-accessed mountain biking/hiking,logging & gas plants,,recreation,no,"environment, recreation",leave them alone,don't log anywhere near them or their tributary systems,Fortress Mountain as a summer resort for lift-accessed mountain biking/hiking,fine as is,Fortress Mountain as a summer resort for lift-accessed mountain biking/hiking,yes,their position/advice must be considered as their history of the land in which we live has been theirs and they understand it's nuances best,integral,unsure,not a benefit as they are not a native species to the kananaskis ecosystems,yes definitely,"good, as Fish and Wildlife have determined the necessary restrictions required to promote a balanced state of conservation which is the most important consideration for these areas",less,unsure,"absolutely. again, the First Nations position/advice must be considered as their history of the land in which we live has been theirs and they understand it's nuances best","Fortress Mountain as a summer resort for lift-accessed mountain biking/hiking. we either have Canada Olympic Park or are required to travel to Golden BC for the nearest resort. the national parks won't allow summer resorts (lake louise, sunshine, norquay, etc) which makes the only viable option within a reasonable distance, those winter resorts located in the kananaskis valley. Fortress Mountain has flopped as a winter resort, it isn't big enough, yet is simply the perfect location and size for a summer resort for biking/hiking. this would also relieve some impact on the kananaskis trail systems through the area as well.","i grew up in K-country, i love it. it's my backyard."
yes,yes,infrequently,infrequently,any hiking trail,camping,Peter Lougheed Park,deer,The mountains and trees,Signs of clearcutting and golf courses,Camping @Sunrise Lodge,Nothing more than there is available already,"hike, bicycle, camp, picnic, site-see",,I would keep it as untouched and pristine as possible. Maintain what is already there. Look at what is lacking and prioritize from there.,no,All the trees that have been clearcut,golf courses and big resorts,The availability of camping spots.,nature,no,,Minimize human access.,ALL homes that do not have water meters should be required to have one installed. Limit watering times in the summer.,Keep big developers out.,"I have mixed feelings about this. If it isn't in the best interest of K-Country, get it out.",The camping spots in Peter Lougheed are beautiful. It's just tough to get in there.,"Yes, the impact of industrial/agricultural activities is a concern.",To protect and respect the land. I have reservations about their right to hunt year round.,Very.,I think it has been but I worry about the long-term effects of the logging industry.,I do not think it is a problem.,Yes we do need to know more about all 4 issues.,Good.,Less access for large groups and commercial operators.,Broaden the boundaries if anything. Not sure how.,Yes.,Not sure.,
yes,yes,regularly,frequent,"moosepackers, ace of spades",mountain biking,moose mountain,deer,scenery,gas plant,mountain biking,continue to enjoy it,bicycle,,establish a park,yes,government funding to maintain the area as it is,clear cuts,,all,no,environment,limit development,conserve the watershed,,,,yes for industrial,"not much that i can see, except for them allowing clear cutting",very,the forest must be maintained for future generations,"used responibly, no problem",ecology,good,no as long as they respect the area,yes make it a park,yes,no,it is important to preserve the area that is so close to calgary. watershed and recreation.
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Chester Lake,hiking,Upper Kananaskis Lake,black bear,William Watson Lodge,Endless stream of logging trucks in early 1990's,too many activities to choose,non-motorized outdoor recreation,"hike, bicycle, ski, camp, site-see",,"Improve trail markings, accessibility to persons with disabilities.",no,stewardship,resource extraction,don't try to mix business with pleasure,recreation,no,"environment, recreation","Limit activities which negatively impact the environment, i.e. resource extraction, motorized trail activities.",Protect the ecosystems surrounding the watersheds from further development.,"Preserve natural areas, maintain recreation infrastructure i.e. campgrounds, trails and roads.","Reasonable access to all, but not to the point of degrading a site by overuse. Stop all resource extraction and preserve this area for low impact, outdoor recreational use.","Concentrate on maintaining existing facilities, I do not see the need to expand.",Absolutely.,"To offer historical input on area, and to refrain from future resource extraction. The logging that occurred in the early 1990's cannot be repeated.",Very important.,No.,Not a problem when health of ecosystem is the priority in decision making.,Ecology and tourism.,Good.,"Access should continue to be controlled, if necessary reduce access.",Eliminate resource extraction and give area protection as a provincial park.,Yes.,No comment.,"Easy access for one million plus citizens within an hours drive, giving people the ability to connect with a natural environment on a regular basis."
no,yes,occasionally,occasionally,,hiking,,"Moose, bear",The mountain Views,Dams along the K-River,Hiking,Use the land and resources without being told what I can and cannot do like hunting,"hike, OHV, ski, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, hunt, fish, work",,"I would invest in campgrounds, upgrade hiking trails and invest in reforestation to ensure future of our forests",yes,More interpretive trails,Anymore large recreational developments like resorts,Large rec. developments need to be restricted to ensure mountain view aren't obstructed,all,yes,logging,Logging plays a crutial role as there is an absense of fire on landscape which mother nature uses to replenish the forest. Logging essentially allows for this diversity by giving the forest to restart as was intially intented.,Water quality is a factor of downstream use and as long as all users ensure they do their part to protect the streams no issues should arise.,More guided tours would be great as well as interpretive trails. More trail for young families as well.,Everyone should have access to K-Country. It is crown land and owned by all Albertan. Both recreation and industrial activity should be exceptable and I see no problems with the multi-use policy.,The rec facilities are fine as they are.,"No, your website show pictures of signage put in place to ensure all trail users are aware of any industrial activities in the area.",They are an important part as their traditional knowledge of the area is important to both the indrustial and recreational aspects of K-Country,"Very important, views should not be obstructed by buildings at large resorts.","Yes, as stated above, without allowing k-country to burn or be logged, forest would grow to the point that the blowdown within the forest would jepordize wildlife movement and recreational maintenance would need to increase. The need for logging high susceptable pine stands is also needed to help reduce the spread of mountain pine beetle.","Neither, it is just there for them to use for their benefit which is fine.",We can always learn more about the ecology of a place but aside from that there is nothing.,As long as it is being manage appropriately and not letting populations grow to large I see no problem with that.,no comment,"No, the area is just fine the way it is.","Absolutely, these are an important part of the history that helped develop this land.",More interpretive programs,The scenic views are beautiful with a diverse wildlife population. The forest needs to be managed but large recreation ventures need to be controlled so that the natural beauty can be maintained and not have a large town in the middle of K-Country
yes,yes,frequent,frequent,Baldy Pass,mountain biking / splitboarding,"All of K-country is stunningly beautiful, I love it all",Moose,The regions of relatively undisturbed beauty. Jumping Pound Ridge.,what's been done to Baldy and the TransCanada Trail. Nakiska is quite disgusting too.,"Everytime I'm out, it's an amazing adventure. Splitboarding down Black Prince was spectacular.","All activites that are self-propelled, such as hiking, skiing, biking.","hike, bicycle, ski, climb, camp, picnic, site-see, study",,I would spend it on creating more park area and having it monitored to prevent abuses.,yes,A general degree of appreciation and respect from Ted Morton.,4X4's and bush parties with drunken fools. Oil and gas exploration and logging.,Oil and gas and logging occurs. Implement government officials who listen to the needs of the people,nature,no,recreation,"Implement a moratorium on logging and oil and gas exploration. Also, continual environmental and biodiversity assessments to hone in on places that need added protection or repair.","Stop watering the golf course in K-Country! Also, heavier restrictions on industry in the parks, especially oil and gas.",Stop the intrusion of industry. Promotion of Kananaskis country as a world-class place of beauty to visit - much like Lake Louise. No more developments. Simply leaving the place alone to allow people to explore.,The multi-use policy is flawed in that it allows corporate interests to muscle in over the silent majority and override concerns of the average person. Recreationists and conversationists should have access only.,"The current facilities, I feel are excellent. To make them any more amenable would be a waste of money and intrude to far into the wilderness aspect of K-country.","Absolutely. The logging trucks pose a constant threat, as well as the questionable environmental policies that surround the various oil and gas explorations within K-Country.",I feel that their role should be to be stewards of the land and act as conservationists. Note that the building of casinos does not fall into the above actions.,Absolutely important. That's why people go there!,"Currently, under Ted Morton, it is being abysmally managed. Case in point, the logging debacle undergoing right now, which flies in the face of science. This is a shameful display of short-sightedness.","Currently, under the existing condition., I feel that the grazing of cattle is a problem. Cattle's effects such as grazing and tearing up the wildnerness is ridiculous, as well as the animals that ranchers kill to protect cattle.","We need to know far more about ecology, the current state of the park, and how to maintain its beauty and foster positive growth.",Absolutely. In fact the hunting of bears and cougars should be eliminated.,"Access for large groups and commercial operators should be completely restricted. Typically, commercial operators are concerned ultimately with finances and the environment second. This ethic allows the park to suffer.","Maintain boundaries, and slowly grow them outwards. Jurisdiction should reside under an independent panel that has the genuine interests of preserving the park.","Definitely. Without knowledge of the past, we are lost for the future.",Current facilities are excellent. More programs are needed to promote an appreciation for how special this area is.,"K-Country is interesting for its diversity, sheer beauty, and it's accesibility for recreationists to play in a relatively wild area. What's wrong with K-Country is not the park itself, but governments bowing to commercial pressures. We need true stewardship and protection here - not short-sighted profiteering."
yes,yes,occasionally,occasionally,,hiking,,eagles,the amazing forests and natural beauty which is located so close to Calgary,coming around a pathway into a clearcut area,hiking with family as a child in kananaskis,enjoy outings with my family in a NATURAL environment,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, camp, study",,"I would spend the money protecting the area against those industries that threaten it's natural beauty, such as oil, cattle grazing and logging",yes,the trees. stop cutting them down,"the logging, the cattle",protect the area so that the beauty and the wildlife in the area is preserved,nature,no,"environment, recreation","keep the wilderness wild. the addition of cattle, logging, and oil and gas interests do not work towards a diverse and healthy environment","if we desire to have a continued supply of good drinking water, we should be protecting the rivers from pollution from the start to the end","the reward in kananaskis is not so much what is offered there by man, but what is provided by nature. leave the beauty of it alone, and it will continue to be a rewarding place.",,No,"very much so. the influence of the cattle, the clear cut logging, and the oil and gas industry are threatening the very core of what makes kananaskis such a beautiful country",,"i believe it is of the utmost importance. it would be nice to have somewhere in the richest province in canada that wasn't spoiled by the quest for money. it would be nice to have a place where future generations could travel to, to see the beauty that alberta has to offer.",no. it's being logged. that's not good management.,it is a problem. cattle are in no way a benefit to the natural ecosystem in kananaskis.,ecology.,good.,less access,"increase the boundaries of protected areas in kananaskis, and start to invest in the area as a natural park as opposed to a resource to be exploited",yes,education to the public about what is happening in kananaskis,
yes,yes,occasionally,infrequently,,hiking,barrier lake,"deer, birds",wilderness,logging roads,hiking on a summers day,"hike, bike ans ave it for my kids and grand-kids","hike, ski, swim, picnic, site-see",,create a park and a foundation to maintain it,yes,park status,logging and other resource industries,"unsustainable development, unhindered by this gov't.",nature,no,oil&gas,"Properly regulated and restricted big industry, especially logging and oil/gas",Restrict any activity that is not properly studied for its effect on the watershed.,"Make it into a full park status area, that way we can enjoy it for generations to come","Multi-use' is just a word. Clear-cut logging ismono-use' - nothing else mettaer to these people. If you clear-cut, thats it: no other recreational use is possible because you have removed the vegetation!","Within a new park, more trais etc for hikers/bikers. Ban on motorsied vehicles.","Absolutely! Logging should not be happening here and is unsustainable, contrary to what Mr. Morton espouses.","If this is their land then they should be involved in maintaining it, otherwise, give them jobs in a new Park to help preserve it.","Very important. Eco-tourism works elsewhere in the world, why not here?",Not as far as I can see under this gov't. Big industry has its way regardless of the impact they have.,"If done right it could be a huge benefit. Cattle need to be moved around a lot so grass is not trampled. It will then regenerate very quickly, providing even more grazing.",Definitely. Ecology and agriculture and tourism possibilities.,Good. How much do we really know about the wildlife and numbers of bears etc.? Knowledge should preceed action.,"If operators are responsible and stick to the rules then fine. Regulation is needed so that the area is not ruined, as is happening now. That's why we need a Park.",No idea!,Yes.,See #5 above.,"This is a lovely wilderness area and should be preserved as such. Industry has no place torape and pillage' the land as they are currently doing. Logging has no place here, and especially when done for bogus reasons (pine beetle damage). Let nature take its course as it was intended. God gave us this land - we are merely stewards - we shoud do all we can to preserve it for the future generations."
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Big Elbow Loop,mountain biking,Kanaskis,mountain goat,view from Moose Mountain,gas pipelines,Cross Country cycling,bike whithout seeing a single pipeline or clear cut,bicycle,hiking,1. rip out all the oil and gas installations 2. stop logging 3. have trail patrols to ensure friendly trail usage,no,better trail marking,industrial installations,clear cuts are ugly but by planting new trees would fix it,recreation,no,environment,stop oil and gas developments,stop oil and gas developments,stop oil and gas developments,Horses should be allowed only on designated triails. Other than that multi-use is working great,picnick areas,extremelly,to educate about harmony with enviroment,very,except oil and gas developemnts and logging,"big problem, cattle destroys trails and are not species that belong in the wild","ecology, oil and gas logging impact on the rest of the area",good,it is about right,no,yes,impact of oil and gas/logging industry on the area,It is very fragile area. There should be no industrial developments allowed.
yes,yes,frequent,frequent,Powder face,Climbing,Prairie Creek,"Black Bears, Deer",The wide scenic valley with the forests and the mountain peaks and the rivers running through it all,The large swaths of missing forest taken down in an unsustainable manner,Exploring for ice climbs,Enjoy Kananaskis with other user groups in a environmentally sustainable manner.,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb, skate, camp, swim, picnic, site-see, hunt, fish, study, work",,"Through reserach develop a three year strategy that -addresses what the different needs are for eah user group -discusses how, with conservation being the guiding principle, we can manage user group needs -implement the strategy and evaluate success",yes,A recognition that there are other ways to meet our economic needs than through resource extraction,unsustainable resource extraction,The environment. Mandatory compliance with best practice sustainable resource development,nature,yes,"environment, tourism, recreation, guiding","Start practicing what is being preached and STOP CLEARCUTTING! Ensure sustainable forestry practices and do unscheduled checks to make sure industry is performing accordingly, designate the area a park. Enforce mandatory third party environmental audits before logging an area. Actually heed listen to those who are presenting helpful and useful information. Recognize that money is not everything and that without an environment to support human kind money won't matter because we won't be here.","Don't let the government of Alberta sign the Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement (TILMA) which effectively allows our water resources to be sold to the United States and ultimately opens our doors to the rest of the NAFTA countries to exploit our water resources. Take the power away from industry, currently they make the decisions our government enforces. STOP CLEAR CUTTING! It doesn't make sense and it has a net negative impact on river health that has a direct negative impact on ecological and human health.","Time and money invested into the development and application of education programs designed to inform the public of the vast and beautiful wilderness on their doorstep. If people are going to take action then they need to know what they stand to lose, and why they should care. Apparently (although our government does not reflect this) the environment and it's protection are the most important topics for Canadians. Why not capitalize on this fact. Develop an MPHIA type program for guides, interpreters and any other officail who comes in contact with the public. Dissemination of information is paramount to get people involved","NO! the multi use policy is not working. Who shouldn't have access? INDUSTRY until they agree to include themselves in progressive methods and education outlined in question one. User groups who are wiling to manage themselves in a manner that promotes conservation of the natural environment, and who are willing to become involved in education and or practicing suatinable habits.",On the whole I would say that kananskis has some of the best recreational facilities around.,I'm not concerned about my safety however I am concerned about the industrial/ agricultural activities. I will start to get concerned if logging continues to clear cut undermining stable slopes in areas where recreational usage occurs. I would also be concerned about the proximity of a sour gas well in close proximity to a water source that is paramount to ecological integrity and that also is a source of water for a greater population of people. I don't trust industry to make good decisions with the environements and the people's best interests in mind. In fact it has already shown that it does not make good decisions ie. the reason for this survey,"I'm not entirely sure what area of Kananaskis is comprised of traditional First Nations Lands. However traditionally these people were stewards of the land. Unfortunatley through oppression, segregation, and loss of tradition and culture they were quickly bought out and left to dwell, for instance, in the hole we call the Morley Reserve. They should be encouraged to help develop education programs that not only enlighten those who are not First Nations about their cultures and traditions but also the ways in which they live with the land rather then way the land is being exploited.","I like to think that the views are what draw people to the Kananaskis. Without the view what would draw people in. Its well known that Canada's Rocky Mountains are some of the most spectacular and sought after scenery in the world. The limited and narow scope of a few industry businesses threatens to ruin one of our countries greatest natural assets. It might interest you to know that Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries in the world. Why not create a sustainable tourism plan for the area that would help prouce revenue for the communities in Kananaskis, the provincial and the federal government. If we don't promote tourism and get people to come see this natural wonder then w leave it wide open to industry to do what they will. A need has to be created.","Not from the information I have read, not from the pictures I have seen, and not from my physical experience. Clear cutting is a poor way to manage what could be a renewable resource. A quick buck in somebodies pocket does not equal a benefit to the environment or the user groups involved with the area.","Again it depends on the sustainability of the operation. If cattle grazing in the area are causing irreperable damage and the river systems, flora and fauna are suffering as a result then yes, I would say it is a problem.","YES! I realize logging companies had access to the area designated as Kananaskis well before the area was designated as such, however nothing remains static and policies must change as does everything else. Trying to manage an area like it was managed sixty years ago is stupid. We have more infomation now and new techniques developed to replace older more destructive ones. Why wouldn't we use them. Ecology is dynamic, industry tied to the area seems to be static. Learning is a continual process, as we learn more about ecology we need to re-assess how industry operates in a given area, and we need to re-assess what options tourism has and how it can function. If cattle grazing is doing no good for the area then we need to re-assess how it is done.",Fishing and hunting should be used as a measure to cull animal and fish populations that are high for a given area. If restrictions are in place to allow a population to grow then those restrictions make sense and I would say they are a good thing.,"Are these large groups and commercial operators using durable surfaces, are they in an area where they will not be trampling sensitive flora and fauna. I think if if sites are built to host large groups and commercial operators, such as Patties Flats, then they should be more then welcome to use them. How many of these sites should be developed would depend on the number of user groups wanting into the area and an assessment of ecological factors that would be threatened from further development of these sites","I'm not sure how to aswer this other than to say I think at least temporary protected status is needed until we can all sit down at the table an hash this one out. Currently everything is happening out of desperation while the forest is being chopped down. From past experience, acting in haste is no way to make decisions that will affect future generations. A moratorium on logging and other industrial activities in Kananaskis should be made and a round table meeting should ensue to get all of the cards on the table.",YES! How else are we to understand the significance of the area to all user groups such as the First Nations.,"Eduation programmes regarding the intricacy of ecology in Kananaskis country, our impact as humans using the area, and our responsibility in conserving it. It may have escaped some people but without an environment to support us we will cease to exist. Its that simple.",WE NEED TO STOP CURRENT PRACTICES IN K-COUNTRY UNTIL ALL USER GROUPS HAVE A CHANCE TO SIT DOWN AND DISCUSS WHAT DIRECTION THE AREA SHOULD TAKE. THE POWER OF INDUSTRY NEEDS TO BE RELINQUISHED UNTIL IT CAN BE PROVEN THAT THE WAY THEY ARE CURRENTLY OPERATING BENEFITS THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE CUMMUNITY AT LARGE. WE NEED TO STOP AND THINK
yes,yes,occasionally,infrequently,powderface & moose Mountain,mountain biking,,"everything, moose, deer,etc",the landscape,trees cut down for bs reasons,backcountry mountain biking,more biking,"hike, bicycle, camp, site-see, fish",,build more gravity runs for mountain bike. short one's with switchback's so you could walk back up.,yes,protection of wildlife and nature,beetles,We need less rednecks and more hippies.,nature,no,environment,Protect their natural habitat.,Knowledge,More group rides,,,no,,Extremely,Not anymore,benefit,nope,good,less,,Protect everything you can.,,I just like riding my bike there. less trees means I'm going somewhere else plain and simple.
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,moose packers,kayaking and mountain biking,elbow falls,,the natural enviornment,,,enjoy the area in the future,"hike, run, bicycle, ski, climb",kayak/canoe/raft,,,the area needs more trails/trailheads/parking areas,cows / clearcutting,,nature,no,,,,trails and trailheads/parking areas are often very crowded. people often have to park on the road at busy times. development of new trails and trailheads will help this,,yes. see above,,,very important,,problem to recreationalists such as myself,,,,,,,
yes,yes,occasionally,never,,,,"deer,",peace and quiet,the logging,camping then riding,camp and ride,bicycle,,create a Park that is user friendly and ecological,yes,,,,all,no,environment,,keep power boats out of the bow,quit logging,everyone responsible,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,regularly,regularly,Ribbon Creek,Hiking,Ribbon Falls,Elk,The rivers and streams,The signs of industry,Hiking in general,enjoy the wilderness without having reminders of how we are are losing it.,hike;ski;climb;camp;swim;picnic;horseback;fish;study,snow shoe,revitalize the natural habitat,yes,,,,nature,no,environment;recreation,,"Ensure that if it is being used by industry that it is done in a sustainable way. Water, air and earth are more important than profits.",,,,,,Very,No,At present I haven't found it to be a problem but I do not think I have a full understanding of the impact.,ecology - environmental impact of industry - I don't think that politicians are giving us the full view of the issues.,Yes restriction is good.,Less,Create more protected park land.,Absolutely,,Too much development
yes,yes,occasionally,occasionally,riverside,hiking,elbow falls and riverside,everything I can see,moose mt. area,logged over sites,cross-country skiing at Moose loop,enjoy nature in peace and quiet,hike;bicycle;ski;camp;picnic;site-see,bird watch,"maintain trails, repair and upgrade Wm. Watson Lodge acording to plans already in hand.",yes,,"logging, new construction such as roofed accommodation",stop logging in the entire area,nature,no,environment,Put preservation of natural values first.,"Preferably stop logging but control what remains, and control cattle to keep them away from watershed areas.","Increase and improve interpretive activities such as hikes and campfire talks, but decrease staged events except in already developed areas.",Multi-use can never work. Cut down on motorized vehicle use and control what exists rather than having vehicles destroying the landscape.,"Take care of what we already have, do not build new facilities.",Cattle are not sufficiently well controlled.,,Extremely,NO,"Problem, but also a benefit to some extent. Could be better managed.",Who is we? General public or scientists? Probably yes to both.,Good,Less,"Entire area should be managed by parks with minimal commercial, industrial and agricultural use.",Definitely,Take care of what is already there.,Most people go for natural values such as overall scenery and wildlife. Exploitation for destructive activities such as motorized vehicles and logging should be phased out or strictly controlled.
yes,yes,regularly,infrequently,Jumping Pound Ridge (& Summit Connector),Mountain Biking,,Not Bears,Everything Including the Gorgeous Forest,The Logging,Mountain Biking Pretty much all over it,"Mountain Bike, Hike, Camp, Run, Bring Back Fortress Ski Hill",hike;run;bicycle;ski;skate;camp;swim;picnic,Snowboard,"Pay someone to make more mountain bike trails, market the area to mountain bikers around and design a low impact enviornmentally friendly hotel which would cater to mountain bikers. If our gov't allows logging, but no new ski hills? That makes no sense.",yes,A new ski hill or re-opening Fortress Ski Hill,"Loggers, 4x4 machines",Get the loggers out and invest in Tourism to generate money,nature,no,environment;tourism;recreation;retail;guiding;realestate,Sustainable low impact reacreation development and enviornmental practices as well as possibly adding entrance fees if need be.,Ensure that developments do not happen along these water lines,"Mountain bike racing events, more accomidations, perhaps a new golf course, or new ski hill.","There should be now big industry of any kind in this area, if the business is not tourist or recreation related, then they should not be there.","Yes, as noted above, there are limited resources within this area, however, being a mountain biker, I'm also happy with the way it is currently (not the loggin)","Absolutely, this area is to special to have any large scale industries happening within it's boundaries.",They should be involved in the decision making regarding these lands.,"Extremely, this area serves as a close hub of recreation to Calgary and neighbouring communities and is one of the factors in luring business to Calgary.","If theres loggin happening, then no, it is not being managed properly, there should be no logging in this area.","I don't see this so much as a problem, however, I would not want to see expansion of any of the ranches just maintanence of what is already there.","There should be studies, however I still believe this area is a park for people to enjoy recreation in.",I don't know.,"I think if these groups are recreation related and are firmly building and practicing enviornmental policies, then they should be allowed access.","If they are allowing logging, then yes, there needs to be new leadership","Yes, absolutely","As listed above, there could some commercial development in my opinion related to tourism, but it must be done in a responsible way.","K Country I acctually find is the most beautiful part of Alberta and I'm proud to say that it's in my backyard. I'm concerned about any large industries that may be in these boundaries that are not there for recreation, conservation, or tourism."
yes,yes,frequent,occasionally,Cox Hill,Mountain Biking,Top of Cox Hill,Grizzly Bears,Valley with steep wall at end of Powderface trail,Dam at Barrier Lake,Moose Packers Trail probably,Continue to bring people biking who have never been,ski;climb;camp,,I would give 1 million dollars to one of the logging companies in return for them not logging 1 million dollars worth of trees,yes,Maps at trail heads,Hunting,Kananskis is actually in pretty good shape,recreation,no,,Designate trails and make it illegal to have trails whereever you want.,,,,,,,Very.,,"It is not a problem provided the land can support it. At a certain density the cows start to kill all of vegitation. At this point, in my opinion, it is too many. This can be seen on gorge creek trail, where cows have nearly destoryed half the trail.",,Hunting should be restricted anywhere that people may be biking or hunting. I have been biking on mouse mountian before and I could see hunters shooting a deer. I don't want to get hit.,"Large groups are fine, but it would be nice it they would register with the trail reports website if they are going to lock down the trail to the public, so that you don't find out once you are out there. I have had this issue with sulphur springs and bike races before.",,,"No new facilities are needed. Between gragg creek and Barrier Lake Interpretive / university station, there are plenty of facilities if they are needed.","K-country is unique because if you live in Calgary, (like 1 million albertans do), it is really the only wilderness area you can get to after work. You can drive out there after work, go hiking or biking, and then drive back before dark (in the summer). If it is cut down, this somewhat eliminates evening trips."
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,"Nahihi Ridge/Creek, Moose Mountain Fire lookout, Ribbon Creek, Galatea","Hiking, Biking, Camping, Cross Country Skiing",Powderface,"Bears, Deer, Flora and Fauna, Frogs, Fish, all living things",KANANASKIS- all natural things,"Highways, Clearcutting, sour gas flares, logging roads","Camping, hiking, biking, backpacking, running",everthing I do now as long as it doesn't interfere with future plans to preserve the area,hike;run;bicycle;ski;camp;swim;picnic;site-see;horseback;fish;study;work,,"Buy as much area as I could to preserve and avoid from clearcutting, oil and gas developments, raise awareness about the ecosystem and how important it is to Southern Western Alberta.",yes,TREES!!!!,"NO TREES!, Oil and Gas Developments, only ATV trails- no large vehicle trails (ie. mclean creek)",People's view that they can make a profit by clearcutting the area and it will grow to be the same,nature,yes,environment;tourism;recreation;retail,"To have balance, ensure that there is limited access to the area, reduce the amount of logging, oil and gas, agricultural developments...",See above.,See above,"I don't believe the multi-use policy is working, Mclean Creek is a mess, plans for logging in the areas are massive, increase in people using the areas for recreation as Calgary become larger and Kananaskis becomes better known, oil and gas developments are frequent.",NO,MOST DEFINITELY,First Nations also depend on the resources as well as cultural aspects of the land.,It's the main reason people visit,I don't believe so,"a problem , cattles feces/urine change the composition of the soil, the cattle also graze in areas which may be sensitive and make new trails in areas where there may not have been previously.","Ecology, we can never fully know how we impact pristine areas, there is no way to tell what damage is being done (fully) and if it is reversible.",Fantastic.,"If there is more access for commercial operators, then other developments should be limited","Yes, re assess the land use/planning",DEFINITELY,"Informational programs, clean up programs",That thousands love the beauty of K-Country yet only a few have the time to fill out a survey on the importance of this wonderful gift.
yes,yes,occasionally,occasionally,Blueberry Hill,X-country skiing,Lakes,,Lower Kananaskis Falls,Upper Lakes camp area,Skiing,,hike;bicycle;ski;camp;picnic,,handle garbage better,yes,,off-road vehicle facilities,,nature,no,,"Mostly, leave it alone. Stewardship, not agriculture.",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,"Cox Hill, Jumpingpound, Powderface, and Tom Snow",mountain biking,Sibbald Flats Campground,"Elk, deer, and mountain goats",Nature,Anything that threatens this place,Camping and Mt. biking,enjoy the area in relative silence,hike;bicycle;skate;camp;swim;picnic;site-see,,,yes,,,,nature,no,oil&gas,Leave the land alone,Reduce our footprint on the land,Don't let anyone wreck it,Hunting makes me nervous when mt. biking in the fall,,Yes,Not sure,"Very, it's world class",,"Cow patties can be messy. But if it means we can keep enjoying the area, so be it.",,Good.,,If we could make it bigger.,,,What a unique land use area. So many people can enjoy it so many different ways.
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,Mouse Mountain / Elbow Valley,Mountain Biking / Hilking,Powderface Ridge,Flowers,The clear clean water and lush forest,Clear cut sections of the forest,Mountain Biking,All that I currently do with the view that is there now,hike;run;bicycle;ski;climb;skate;camp;picnic;site-see,,"I would spend it on trail maintenence i.e. containing soil erosion, improving drainage, removing fallen trees.",no,Nothing,Logging Trucks & ATV's & Motorcycles,Too many groups with competing objectives have access to K-country. Create a park.,nature,no,environment;recreation,"To stop allowing heavy induatry into the area i.e. loging, oil and other resource activities.",Put pressure on Sustainable Resources to stop logging due to the impacts on the water shed. Maybe if Calgary carefully monitors the economic impact from this latest round of clear cutting on it's water treatment plant someting can be done. Let's face it in Albera economics rule and the voice of a few hundred people is insignificant.,"Just leave it alone, and keep the loggers out. If loging must be done the use sustainable logging practices such as Harvester technologies prove elsewhere in the world.",This area ahould belong to the people who use it for recreational purposes not the companies that prosper from it economically. The multi-use policy puts too many groups with competing objectives in the same place.,The facilities are sufficient.,Yes absolutely. Have you ever hit a tree stump on a bike? I am concerned about being poisioned because our water treatment plant may get so blocked up with sediment cause by ground water run off that it could not properly clean the water. We live in Redwood Meadows which is on Native land and relies on the Elbow river for it's water.,"Not to be overlooked, they have a voice that is to be heard. However given the small number of respondents to this survey and the realtively impoverished state of most people on resrves it is unlikely that voice will be heard, certainly not on a site like this. Only perhaps be a cheif, and we all know how often the public listens to them.",Vital. Tourists do not like looking at clear cut secitons of the forest. People do not like recreating in open field of foothills with the remains of logging activities scattered about. It is ugly and not necessary.,"No, Sustainable resources is a joke. They are so far joined to industry that they have lost the perspective a government department should have. They allow the logging companies to advise the public on their activities and they have not required the use of better logging practices. They are not acting as steward of the land.",This is an awful practice as the cattle use trails to move from one grazing area to the next. The trouble is the trails are often wet and the impact of a heard of cattle on these wet trails is massive. The cattle create soil erosion and remove plant material the combats soil erosion. There is no need for the cattle in Kananskis. The economic benefit of a few ranchers does not exceed the impact to the rest of society caused by this activity.,"I am not sure who you are referring to as we? If you mean Calgarians then I would say absolutely. They need to know what the impact on the Elbow River, which supplies 15% of their water will be. That economic cost over time could then be compared to the economic benefit enjoyed by local people from the logging. That kind to analysis might be useful and I would expect it is the kind of analysis Sustainable Resources should do but does not. The economic impact from the estetic impact should also be measured and included in such analysis.",Good. Hunters shoot things they should not. Mountain bikers fall into the catagory of things that should not be shot at.,"Keep it small. That is the alure to this part of the world, it is not nor should it be a Banff. That is why we have places like Banff.","The boundaries are fine. The jurisdiction i.e. the ruling part Sustainable resources is not fine. Get the area into the hands of people that want to treat it as a park and preserve it. How, through political pressure.",To the extent that it still allows rectreation to occur fluidly in the area. If boundaries are created all over the place restricting access I would vote against this. Clearly knowing the number and locations of areas required for these purposes would allow for a better more informed response to this question.,Keep industrial activity out.,"The remote nature takes you back to the days when cars were not everywhere. Although the area is accessible by vehicle it is not dominated by them. You are dropped off at natures doorstep and from there what you do is your choice. Unfortunately one of the groups let in is industry, ranchers, loggers and oil. These people wish to take this beauty with them for their own selfish purposes. Taking away from all the other people the views, the fresh air, the clean water and the joy of discovering something pure and prestine."
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,powder face,mt biking,kcountry,everything,views,clear cuts,mt biking,outdoor activities,hike;run;bicycle;ski;camp,,,no,,logging and oil and gas,,nature,no,environment;recreation,,,leave it as wild as possible,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,powderface,mountain biking,K-country,moose,trees,clear cut areas,mountain biking,mountain biking,hike;bicycle;ski;climb;skate;camp;picnic,,Maintain the existing trails to a high level so there is no need to create more.,no,communication between parks and rec with industry,clear cut blocks on pre-existing trails,clear cut blocks on pre-existing trails. don't allow logging on established trails.,all,,recreation;oil&gas,"regulations to govern all human activity (industrial and recreational) that provide protection to natural ecosystems, while still allowing commercial and recreational activities to be done in the areas.","minimize contamination of watersheds as much as possible, but allow activity should it be shown to have minimal impact on watershed",Need up to date and complete information made widely available to the general public to ensure everyone is informed of planned development.,"Multi-use policy has worked in the past, however it seems the logging has proceeded beyond most folks perceived scope. We cannot have our cake and eat it to (high standard of living with expansive recreational opportunity, but not allow industry in the same areas). Have to allow a balance of recreational and commercial use.",not really. mother nature has provided the facilities.,"not the safety, but impact of expansive industrial use in the core recreational corridor concerns me.","In my opinion, minimal.",Very important.,Balance between recreation and industry has not been balanced - who mows down the TransCanada trail??,Neither.,The ecoligical/industry balance needs to be considered and communicated more effectively.,Good.,"As long as environmental effects are minimal, access should be granted.","not really, manage the existing areas better.",yes,none really.,"K-Country is a wonderful recreational paradise with easy access to outdoor loving people from Calgary and surrounding area. There needs to be a better balance between rec areas and those used for industrial activity, especially logging due to the expansive impact on space it has."
yes,yes,occasionally,occasionally,,,,,,,,,hike;ski,,,yes,,,,nature,no,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes,yes,regularly,infrequently,"Prairie View, Terrace Trail, Highwood Pass",Cycling,Kananaskis,Bears,mountains,section of the Evan Thomas Trail where heavy machinery was working,"riding up Prairie View in early April, snow had such a crust I could ride anywhere!",mountain bike and road ride. hike. camp.,bicycle;camp;swim;picnic;site-see,,"Build a campground like Banff's Tunnel Mountain Campground - to be more surrounded in trees, but still have some amenities (like showers).",yes,campgrounds (as above). entrance fee,N/A,threat of logging is a concern about the longevity of Kananaskis country,nature,no,recreation,"Have seen where trails are closed, other trails see an increased traffic, and this accelerates wear/errosion. Please don't close trails (seasonal closures understood and accepted).",prevent construction or major activities that can place a large amount of sediment in the streams and rivers.,I like it as it is!,I do like that there are a variety of trails that offer different challenges and rewards. I'd say that it's working,I wouldn't say so,"My safety, no worries. I am very concerned about industrial/agricultural activities",I don't believe that they have any role,extremely important.,"Undecided. In Kananaskis Valley (along highway 40), I would say yes. What I see closer to Bragg Creek area, I would say no. I've seen logging activities, and can't think that this is good for the wilderness.",Minor problem when the cattle are on the road - not a big deal.,N/A,"being so close to Calgary, without the restrictions the hunting/fishing could easily deplete the wildlife. So the restrictions are good.",I wouldn't want to see this area turned into a party playground. Keep the areas as is.,I would like to see Kananaskis be a national park like Banff or Jasper.,I would like to see the protection of these resources.,N/A,I really like the rugged wilderness - that the mountains are closer together than that of Banff. I like that Kananaskis isn't too commercial (like Banff or Jasper). It's nice to go there to get away from the tourists like what's in Banff and Jasper.
yes,yes,occasionally,occasionally,All of them,"skiing, hiking, biking and just relaxing",I love a lot of places,moose,The trees and and the mountians,cattle and clear-cut,"just being there and enjoying the beauty, whether it's skiing, or hiking, etc.",Enjoy Kananaskis and it's beauty,ski,,Stop Logging and make a park,yes,Nothing,Cattle,,nature,no,,,,,No,Outhouses,,,,,Problem,,Good,Less,,,,I love the beauty of Kananaskis and I couldn't bear if it was taken away (aka. logged)
yes,yes,regularly,occasionally,Cox Hill or Praire Veiw,mountain biking & ice climbing,,,a wild environment so close to Calgary that was relatively protected,was litter and Nakiska now the logging by far,the ride down from Cox hill in the fall colours,keep enjiying it in a unmolested form in years to come,bicycle;climb,,put in toilets at all trail heads,yes,,oil & gas; logging,a spirit by the government to protect the area for future public use,recreation,no,tourism;recreation,keep extraction based industry out of the area,maintain the area in a natural state allowing for nature to keep the water 'pure',"keep it the same, or maintain trails a little better","no, oil & gas, logging, mining and cattle grazing should not be allowed",toilets at trail heads,"yes, especially logging and to a lesser extent il & gas extraction",,very; it is close to calgary and a large draw for tourism to the area,"it was until the clear cutting started, selective cutting would be much more appropriate",yes it is a problem. it generally contaminates the rivers to a point and generally makes trails more difficult to use,ecology and tourism,good it allows a buffer before the national & provincial parks,about the same,it would be nice if the whole area were a park,yes,,"the different parks and other areas need to be combined (ie: Peter Lougheed, Bow Valley and the others) plus need to prevent the access by extractive operations"
yes,yes,occasionally,regularly,"Moose, Telephone, Tom Snow, and Crystal Line",cross-country skiing,West Bragg and Allen Bill Pond,plants and deer,The sunlight streaming through the trees and making the snow glitter,logging operations,Mountain biking the Telephone Loop and getting caught in the early season mud,Enjoy the nature and wildlife while doing a sport,hike;bicycle;ski;climb;camp;swim;picnic;site-see,,I would make the West Bragg and Moose Mountain Areas natural parks so that other people could witness the amazing experiences I have.,no,protection against the area and possibly a small hut,Logging,Nothing,recreation,no,environment;recreation;film,Making natural parks,"Create fines for the pollution of the water, and strict anti-pollutant laws.","Events- fun race around the West Bragg trails Activities- kids day, teens day...","Everyone. Yes the multi-use policy is working, but we should restrict off road vehicles for preservation of the area and water",Yes. Small hut would be good enough,Yes I am concerned deeply about the logging problems in Kananaskis. We should find better areas to take away from because the areas being harmed are the most beautiful.,"To educate Non-Aboriginal folk about the environment, the wildlife, and the spiritual aspects of nature.","It is very important and with the logging of the area, the aesthetics are decreasing rapidly.","Mostly it is, but with new harms arising, we need to fight harder.",This a huge problem because the waste produced by cattle ruins the landscape and water sources.,"No, we just need to explain the issues at hand and back it up by proceeding with protecting Kananaskis.",This is good because this allows the natural order of things to complete its self in the environment and it also creates higher biodiversity.,There should be the same amount of commercial and non-commercial groups in this area.,"Yes, we need to expand in order to create a larger environment for the wildlife.",Yes we should because it gives us information about Alberta's past.,"A small warming hut would be nice, and activities for kids and new skiers would also be nice.","It is an absolutely gorgeous area, and should be preserved for the future generations."
yes,yes,frequent,regularly,Jumping Pound Ridge,biking,Evens-Thomas Creek,moose,Trees,Logging,Joy Climbing Route on Infintingable,Bike,hike;run;bicycle;ski;climb;skate,,More Bike Trails,yes,"Nothing, Keep it simple",Logging,,nature,no,environment;recreation,Eliminate Resourse Extraction,Stop logging and ATVing in these watersheds,"Nothing, Keep it Simple",,No,,,Important keep it pristine,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,